Skip to main content

Table 3 Parameter estimates for associations between RLF and cardiometabolic risk factors and cardiometabolic risk score (n = 3585)

From: Relative residential property value as a socio-economic status indicator for health research

Tertiles (Natural breaks)

 

RR

95% CI

P

Central Obesity***

RLF: 3 v 1

0.89

0.83

0.95

0.0004

 

RLF: 2 v 1

0.93

0.89

0.98

0.0033

Hypertriglyceridemia***

RLF: 3 v 1

0.79

0.70

0.90

0.0005

 

RLF: 2 v 1

0.90

0.82

0.98

0.0173

Reduced HDL#

RLF: 3 v 1

0.79

0.67

0.92

0.0025

 

RLF: 2 v 1

0.87

0.78

0.97

0.0159

Hypertension***

RLF: 3 v 1

0.94

0.88

1.01

0.0824

 

RLF: 2 v 1

0.90

0.85

0.95

<.0001

Diabetic\diabetes Risk***

RLF: 3 v 1

0.52

0.43

0.64

<.0001

 

RLF: 2 v 1

0.79

0.70

0.89

<.0001

High LDL^

RLF: 3 v 1

0.95

0.77

1.17

0.6277

 

RLF: 2 v 1

1.05

0.90

1.23

0.5399

CMR Score***

RLF: 3 v 1

0.81

0.76

0.86

<.0001

 

RLF: 2 v 1

0.91

0.86

0.95

<.0001

  1. Gender, Age and Bachelor Education were included in all models.
  2. *** Gender, Age and Bachelor Education Significant.
  3. # Gender Significant.
  4. ^ Age Significant.