Skip to main content

Table 3 Bivariate results for proportions of water bodies with anopheline larvae versus no larvae by environmental variables collected about the water body (n = 29).

From: Characterization of potential larval habitats for Anophelesmosquitoes in relation to urban land-use in Malindi, Kenya

Variables

Anophelines present (n = 8)

Anophelines absent (n = 21)

χ2

P-value

O.R.

C.I.

Land-use (% residential or commercial)

5 (62.5)

21 (100)

**

   

Size (% small habitats)

3 (37.5)

7 (33.3)

0.045

0.83

1.2

0.22, 6.53

Nature (% human-made)

20 (95.2)

6 (75.0)

**

   

Shade (% some shade)

5 (62.5)

13 (61.9)

0.01

0.98

1.03

0.19, 5.51

Pollution (% polluted)

7 (87.5)

7 (33.3)

6.8

0.01

14

1.43, 137.32

Substrate (% cement or plastic)

7 (87.5)

15 (71.4)

0.82

0.36

2.8

0.28, 27.91

Permanency (% perm. or semi-perm.)

0 (0.0)

5 (23.8)

**

   

Animals present (%)

4 (50.0)

8 (38.1)

0.34

0.56

1.63

0.32, 8.4

Nearest house (% < 20 meters)

6 (75.0)

20 (95.2)

**

   

Drainage (% well drained)

5 (62.5)

16 (76.2)

0.54

0.46

0.52

0.09, 3.0

  1. *d.f. = 1 **Insufficient variability in the data