Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of PEA scenarios (100 model runs each) for changing patterns of pesticide application

From: Spatial modeling of personalized exposure dynamics: the case of pesticide use in small-scale agricultural production landscapes of the developing world

Individual

Non-weighted

Low safety

High safety

(residence)

1 (59)

0.21

0.23

0.19

0.33

0.36

0.29

0.56

0.62

0.49

0.18

0.30

0.50

0.12

0.22

0.38

2 (39)

0.20

0.23

0.18

0.30

0.33

0.26

0.53

0.60

0.46

0.18

0.27

0.47

0.12

0.21

0.36

3 (21)

0.22

0.26

0.19

0.34

0.39

0.29

0.55

0.64

0.47

0.19

0.31

0.52

0.13

0.26

0.44

4 (122)

0.30

0.33

0.27

0.42

0.47

0.38

0.71

0.78

0.64

0.26

0.39

0.67

0.18

0.32

0.57

5 (184)

0.14

0.16

0.12

0.20

0.22

0.17

0.32

0.38

0.27

0.12

0.18

0.29

0.08

0.14

0.23

6 (133)

0.10

0.12

0.08

0.14

0.17

0.11

0.32

0.40

0.23

0.08

0.12

0.30

0.06

0.10

0.25

  1. = mean of exposure magnitudes, = mean of frequency values (proportional count; 1.0 = 192 time steps), = mean of duration values (proportional count of subsequent time steps; 1.0 = 32 time steps). In the scenario "non-weighted" lower confidence limits (LCL; subscripted) and upper confidence limits (UCL; superscripted) of the means (95% confidence level) are given; these ranges would be comparable for the means in both safety scenarios.