Table 2 Commuting probability estimation results
Dependent variable: 1 = at least one commuter, 0 = otherwise | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|  |  |  |  |  |  | 95% C.I. for Exp(β) | |
|  | β | Wald | Df | p-value | Exp(β) | Lower | Upper |
Dist | -.040 (.005) | 73.291 | 1 | .000 | .961 | .952 | .970 |
lf* | Â | 44.126 | 3 | .000 | Â | Â | Â |
lf(1) | -2.713 (.502) | 29.257 | 1 | .000 | .066 | .025 | .177 |
lf(2) | -2.691 (.474) | 32.278 | 1 | .000 | .068 | .027 | .172 |
lf(3) | -2.331 (.469) | 24.713 | 1 | .000 | .097 | .039 | .244 |
Constant | 6.212 (.724) | 73.664 | 1 | .000 | 498.926 | Â | Â |
LR test | 243** | Â | 4 | .000 | Â | Â | Â |
Nagelkerke R2 | .659 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Hosmer and Lemeshow Test | 9.709 | Â | 8 | .286 | Â | Â | Â |