Table 3 Comparison of proximity and coverage measures of spatial access between traditional fast-food restaurants, non-traditional fast-food outlets, and all fast-food opportunities, using the Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test (n = 1,409)
| Â | Z-statistic | P-value |
|---|---|---|
Proximity | Â | Â |
   Traditional fast-food restaurant vs. non-traditional fast-food outlet | 22.99 | <0.0001 |
   Traditional fast-food restaurant vs. all fast-food opportunities | 30.51 | <0.0001 |
   Non-traditional fast-food outlet vs. all fast-food opportunities | 14.10 | <0.0001 |
Coverage (≤ 1 mile) |  |  |
   Traditional fast-food restaurant vs. non-traditional fast-food outlet | -12.50 | <0.0001 |
   Traditional fast-food restaurant vs. all fast-food opportunities | -25.40 | <0.0001 |
   Non-traditional fast-food outlet vs. all fast-food opportunities | -22.49 | <0.0001 |
Coverage (≤ 3 miles) |  |  |
   Traditional fast-food restaurant vs. non-traditional fast-food outlet | -1.67 | 0.094 |
   Traditional fast-food restaurant vs. all fast-food opportunities | -29.24 | <0.0001 |
   Non-traditional fast-food outlet vs. all fast-food opportunities | -25.31 | <0.0001 |
Coverage (≤ 5 miles) |  |  |
   Traditional fast-food restaurant vs. non-traditional fast-food outlet | -5.64 | <0.0001 |
   Traditional fast-food restaurant vs. all fast-food opportunities | -31.39 | <0.0001 |
   Non-traditional fast-food outlet vs. all fast-food opportunities | -27.64 | <0.0001 |