| |
Scan-c
|
Scan-e0
|
FleX
|
GA-1
|
Double
|
Mlink
|
|---|
|
p-value
|
< 0.0001
|
< 0.0001
|
< 0.0001
|
< 0.0001
|
< 0.0001
|
< 0.0001
|
|
No. LZ
|
18
|
18
|
13
|
13
|
8
|
13
|
|
True Positive LZ1
|
10
|
11
|
8
|
9
|
6
|
7
|
|
Sensitivity2
|
0.91
|
1.00
|
0.73
|
0.82
|
0.55
|
0.64
|
|
PPV3
|
0.56
|
0.61
|
0.62
|
0.69
|
0.75
|
0.54
|
|
Cost4
|
9
|
7
|
8
|
6
|
7
|
10
|
- Results for the sixth cluster scenario (compact cluster, E = 50.1 cases, covering 11 LZ), with a relative risk of 2.
- Results based on 250 Monte Carlo replications. Scan-c: circular scan method, Scan-e 0: elliptic scan method with no penalty, FleX: unrestricted flexible scan method, GA-1: strongly penalized genetic algorithm, Double and Mlink: dynamic minimum spanning tree method with double and maximum link connections, respectively. No. LZ: number of living zones in the detected cluster. 1 number of living zones in the intersection of the true and detected clusters. 2 sensitivity: proportion of living zones in the true cluster that are correctly detected. 3 proportion of living zones in the detected cluster that are in the "true" cluster. 4 number of living zones that are either missed or erroneously detected.
