Skip to main content

Table 3 Spatial Error Model Estimation of the Relationship Between Built Environment Features and BMI z-score, 800-meter Network Buffer a

From: Racial differences in the built environment—body mass index relationship? A geospatial analysis of adolescents in urban neighborhoods

Access to Walking Destinations

Community Design Attributes

 

Coefficient

SE

 

Coefficient

SE

A. Recreational open space (density)

  

A. Median pedestrian route directness

  

Model 1

  

Model 1

  

  A: Total Sample

−0.027

0.017

  A: Total Sample

−0.384

0.243

Model 2

  

Model 2

  

  A: White

−0.005

0.039

  A: White

−1.124

0.757

  A X Black

0.011

0.046

  A X Black

0.938

0.860

  A X Hispanic

−0.036

0.044

  A X Hispanic

0.765

0.837

  A X Asian

−0.098~

0.059

  A X Asian

0.798

1.242

  A X Other

−0.018

0.063

  A X Other

0.644

1.259

B. Parks (density)

  

B. Intersection density

  

Model 1

  

Model 1

  

  B: Total Sample

0.034

0.030

  B: Total Sample

0.000

0.002

Model 2

  

Model 2

  

  B: White

−0.035

0.072

  B: White

0.001

0.003

  B X Black

0.155~

0.085

  B X Black

0.003

0.004

  B X Hispanic

−0.009

0.085

  B X Hispanic

−0.003

0.004

  B X Asian

0.085

0.104

  B X Asian

−0.005

0.005

  B X Other

0.163

0.124

  B X Other

0.001

0.006

C. Bus stops (density)

  

C. Sidewalk completeness

  

Model 1

  

Model 1

  

  C: Total Sample

0.004

0.005

  C: Total Sample

0.010*

0.004

Model 2

  

Model 2

  

  C: White

0.029*

0.016

  C: White

0.015

0.010

  C X Black

−0.027~

0.016

  C X Black

−0.004

0.011

  C X Hispanic

−0.029~

0.016

  C X Hispanic

−0.013

0.012

  C X Asian

−0.015

0.020

  C X Asian

0.005

0.016

  C X Other

−0.038~

0.023

  C X Other

0.007

0.019

D. Subway stops (density)

  

D. Average sidewalk width

  

Model 1

  

Model 1

  

  D: Total Sample

−0.039

0.034

  D: Total Sample

0.267~

0.145

Model 2

  

Model 2

  

  D: White

−0.020

0.085

  D: White

0.567~

0.321

  D X Black

−0.007

0.103

  D X Black

−0.156

0.378

  D X Hispanic

0.019

0.101

  D X Hispanic

−0.582

0.389

  D X Asian

−0.063

0.098

  D X Asian

−0.561

0.480

  D X Other

−0.052

0.116

  D X Other

−0.022

0.645

E. Retail destinations (density)

  

E. Average speed limit

  

Model 1

  

Model 1

  

  E: Total Sample

−0.001

0.002

  E: Total Sample

−0.029

0.035

Model 2

  

Model 2

  

  E: White

0.007

0.006

  E: White

0.127

0.106

  E X Black

−0.011

0.008

  E X Black

−0.208~

0.119

  E X Hispanic

−0.003

0.007

  E X Hispanic

−0.112

0.117

  E X Asian

−0.014*

0.007

  E X Asian

−0.203~

0.123

  E X Other

−0.013

0.013

  E X Other

−0.167

0.161

F. Service destinations (density)

  

F. Highway density

  

Model 1

  

Model 1

  

  F: Total Sample

−0.007

0.009

  F: Total Sample

−0.017

0.020

Model 2

  

Model 2

  

  F: White

0.012

0.013

  F: White

0.017

0.042

  F X Black

−0.055

0.034

  F X Black

−0.059

0.070

  F X Hispanic

−0.015

0.031

  F X Hispanic

−0.039

0.054

  F X Asian

−0.036~

0.020

  F X Asian

−0.040

0.052

  F X Other

−0.088

0.060

  F X Other

−0.060

0.105

G. Cultural/educational destinations (density)

  

G. Residential density

  

Model 1

  

Model 1

  

  G: Total Sample

0.001

0.003

  G: Total Sample

0.000

0.000

Model 2

  

Model 2

  

  G: White

0.006

0.007

  G: White

0.000

0.000

  G X Black

−0.002

0.009

  G X Black

−0.000

0.001

  G X Hispanic

−0.002

0.010

  G X Hispanic

−0.000

0.001

  G X Asian

−0.013

0.008

  G X Asian

−0.001

0.001

  G X Other

−0.008

0.017

  G X Other

−0.000

0.001

  1. SE =Standard Error
  2. ~ p < 0.10; * p < 0.05 (bold); ** p < 0.01 (bold).
  3. a Model 1 estimates the association between the built environment and BMI z-score among the total sample; Model 2 estimates the studied association and includes an interaction for race/ethnicity. For each model, we evaluate the estimated effect of each built environment feature separately. All models are adjusted for individual-level race/ethnicity, individual-level gender, individual-level age, individual-level nativity, individual-level family structure (other youth in household), neighborhood-level percent of Black residents, neighborhood-level percent of Hispanic residents, neighborhood-level percent of households below poverty and neighborhood-level percent foreign born for the 800-street network buffer. Regression estimates are also controlled for school using indicator variables.
  4. Note: All density measures are expressed as per square kilometer.