Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of negative binomial, spatial lag, global and local geographically weighted Poisson models

From: Socioeconomic determinants of geographic disparities in campylobacteriosis risk: a comparison of global and local modeling approaches

 

Model type with Coefficient estimates (p-values)

 

Negative Binomial Model

Spatial Lag Model

Global Poisson GWR1 Model

Local Poisson GWR1 Model

Model 1:

   

Min

Max

Intercept

−7.164 (0.0001)

1.716 (0.000)

- 7.155 (0.000)

−8.187

-6.247

Black Race

−0.015 (0.0001)

−0.169 (0.001)

−0.014 (0.001)

−0.0487

0.0218

No diploma

0.021 (0.0004)

−0.012 (0.112)

0.003 (0.003)

−0.0553

0.0533

Unemployed

−0.041 (0.0141)

−0.030 (0.112)

−0.014 (0.009)

−0.1866

0.0851

Urban

0.235 (0.0154)

0.357 (0.014)

0.186 (0.055)

−0.4526

0.9321

Model 2:

     

Intercept

- 6.73 (0.0001)

1.80 (0.000)

- 6.85 (0.000)

−7.71

-4.905

Black Race

−0.0129 (0.0001)

−0.093 (0.000)

−0.012 (0.001)

−0.0161

0.0311

No diploma

0.0175 (0.0009)

−0.018 (0.011)

0.000 (0.003)

−0.0650

0.0882

Unemployed

−0.0330 (0.0433)

−0.026 (0.179)

−0.010 (0.008)

−0.1847

0.0752

Divorced

−0.0260 (0.006)

−0.004 (0.733)

−0.016 (0.005)

−0.2485

0.0382

  1. 1 Geographically Weighted Regression.