Skip to main content

Table 3 Parameter estimates for associations between RLF and cardiometabolic risk factors and cardiometabolic risk score (n = 3585)

From: Relative residential property value as a socio-economic status indicator for health research

Tertiles (Natural breaks)   RR 95% CI P
Central Obesity*** RLF: 3 v 1 0.89 0.83 0.95 0.0004
  RLF: 2 v 1 0.93 0.89 0.98 0.0033
Hypertriglyceridemia*** RLF: 3 v 1 0.79 0.70 0.90 0.0005
  RLF: 2 v 1 0.90 0.82 0.98 0.0173
Reduced HDL# RLF: 3 v 1 0.79 0.67 0.92 0.0025
  RLF: 2 v 1 0.87 0.78 0.97 0.0159
Hypertension*** RLF: 3 v 1 0.94 0.88 1.01 0.0824
  RLF: 2 v 1 0.90 0.85 0.95 <.0001
Diabetic\diabetes Risk*** RLF: 3 v 1 0.52 0.43 0.64 <.0001
  RLF: 2 v 1 0.79 0.70 0.89 <.0001
High LDL^ RLF: 3 v 1 0.95 0.77 1.17 0.6277
  RLF: 2 v 1 1.05 0.90 1.23 0.5399
CMR Score*** RLF: 3 v 1 0.81 0.76 0.86 <.0001
  RLF: 2 v 1 0.91 0.86 0.95 <.0001
  1. Gender, Age and Bachelor Education were included in all models.
  2. *** Gender, Age and Bachelor Education Significant.
  3. # Gender Significant.
  4. ^ Age Significant.