Skip to main content

Table 4 Bivariate and multivariate (Model 2) relationships betweenneighbourhood-level characteristics and physical inactivity in Canadianyouth (N = 6,626)

From: The proportion of youths’ physical inactivity attributable to neighbourhoodbuilt environment features

 

% Exposed

% Physically inactive

Bivariate model

Multivariate model 2

   

RR (95% CI)

RR (95% CI) *

Walkability score

    

 1 (least walkable)

25.4

23.6

1.00

1.00

 2

24.4

26.6

1.32 (1.09-1.57)

1.28 (1.06-1.52)

 3

25.1

29.0

1.27 (1.06-1.48)

1.21 (1.01-1.42)

 4 (most walkable)

25.1

28.8

1.41 (1.18-1.64)

1.32 (1.10-1.56)

P trend

 

.0002

.001

.011

Outdoor play areas

    

Yards at home

    

 4 (most)

32.2

25.5

1.00

1.00

 3

18.0

24.1

0.87 (0.69-1.09)

0.86 (0.69-1.09)

 2

23.9

28.3

1.16 (0.97-1.37)

1.17 (0.98-1.39)

 1 (least)

26.0

29.6

1.17 (0.97-1.39)

1.13 (0.92-1.36)

P trend

 

.001

.024

.066

Density of cul-de-sacs

    

 4 (most)

25.2

24.9

1.00

1.00

 3

23.7

26.6

1.15 (0.93-1.39)

1.17 (0.96-1.40)

 2

25.1

29.0

1.24 (1.01-1.48)

1.23 (1.01-1.47)

 1 (least)

26.1

27.4

1.25 (1.01-1.51)

1.27 (1.04-1.52)

P trend

 

.039

.026

.019

Park space

    

 1 (least)

25.0

21.6

1.00

1.00

 2

24.9

28.0

1.45 (1.19-1.71)

1.42 (1.17-1.68)

 3

25.2

29.0

1.50 (1.27-1.75)

1.43 (1.20-1.67)

 4 (most)

24.9

29.4

1.43 (1.19-1.69)

1.33 (1.09-1.58)

P trend

 

<.0001

.002

.025

Wooded areas

    

 1 (most)

20.0

25.8

1.00

1.00

 2

20.0

26.5

1.07 (0.83-1.35)

1.06 (0.83-1.34)

 3

20.0

29.4

1.19 (0.96-1.45)

1.17 (0.94-1.42)

 4 (none)

40.1

26.7

1.18 (0.96-1.43)

1.11 (0.89-1.35)

P trend

 

.929

.094

.365

Recreation facility density

    

 4 (most)

25.0

26.0

1.00

1.00

 3

26.4

26.4

1.17 (0.96-1.41)

1.17 (0.96-1.41)

 2

25.6

29.0

1.02 (0.83-1.24)

1.08 (0.88-1.29)

 1 (least)

23.1

27.4

0.95 (0.75-1.16)

0.99 (0.81-1.21)

P trend

 

.078

.322

.724

Aesthetics

    

 1 (best)

24.8

24.5

1.00

1.00

 2

24.7

25.7

0.96 (0.78-1.18)

0.96 (0.78-1.18)

 3

25.0

25.6

0.94 (0.76-1.15)

0.88 (0.70-1.07)

 4 (worst)

25.6

32.1

1.28 (1.08-1.49)

1.16 (0.97-1.36)

P trend

 

<.0001

.006

.158

Socioeconomic status

    

 1 (highest)

24.7

23.5

1.00

1.00

 2

25.2

27.7

1.16 (0.95-1.41)

1.10 (0.89-1.34)

 3

24.8

28.1

1.18 (0.96-1.41)

1.08 (0.88-1.30)

 4 (lowest)

25.2

28.6

1.15 (0.95-1.39)

1.12 (0.92-1.34)

P trend

 

.0014

.171

.158

Average temperature

    

 4 (highest)

24.2

26.9

1.00

1.00

 3

27.3

24.3

0.86 (0.69-1.05)

0.82 (0.67-1.00)

 2

23.8

28.7

1.02 (0.83-1.23)

1.06 (0.88-1.26)

 1 (lowest)

24.7

28.4

1.09 (0.88-1.32)

1.14 (0.93-1.37)

P trend

 

.060

.164

.081

Average precipitation

    

 1 (least)

22.9

27.7

1.00

1.00

 2

26.3

23.1

0.96 (0.73-1.25)

0.97 (0.73-1.26)

 3

23.3

29.9

1.13 (0.91-1.38)

1.13 (0.91-1.38)

 4 (most)

27.4

27.7

1.09 (0.85-1.36)

1.13 (0.89-1.40)

P trend

 

.150

.213

.118

Population density

    

 1 (lowest)

24.9

23.9

1.00

1.00

 2

25.1

26.4

1.12 (0.86-1.41)

1.14 (0.89-1.43)

 3

24.7

28.0

1.18 (0.96-1.42)

1.16 (0.95-1.39)

 4 (highest)

25.3

29.6

1.26 (1.04-1.50)

1.14 (0.94-1.37)

P trend

 

<.0001

.017

.197

  1. RR (95% CI) = relative risk (95% confidence interval).
  2. * RR estimates for neighbourhood-level variables in multivariate model 2are adjusted for individual-level covariates (gender, age, race, familysocioeconomic status).