Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of selected primate and human Tanapox ENMs

From: Estimating the geographic distribution of human Tanapox and potential reservoirs using ecological niche modeling

Family

Genus

Species

Ecological models

Ā Ā Ā 

Niche overlap

Rank

Points modeled

Lorsidae

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 
Ā 

Galago

Ā Ā Ā Ā 
Ā Ā 

G. demidoff

0.648

9

28

Cercopithecidae

Ā Ā Ā Ā 
Ā 

Cercopithecus

Ā Ā Ā 
Ā Ā 

C. petaurista

0.729

1

25

Ā Ā 

C. nictitans

0.712

2

16

Ā Ā 

C. campbelli

0.692

3

22

Ā Ā 

C. ascanius

0.669

5

13

Ā Ā 

C. mitis

0.616

10

37

Ā Ā 

C. aethiops

0.577

12

63

Ā Ā 

C. diana

0.549

13

10

Ā Ā 

C. lowei

0.517

14

12

Ā 

Cercocebus

Ā Ā Ā Ā 
Ā Ā 

C. albigena

0.670

4

14

Ā Ā 

C. atys

0.658

7

13

Ā Ā 

C. torquatus

0.613

11

11

Ā 

Colobus

Ā Ā Ā Ā 
Ā Ā 

C. Guereza

0.493

15

37

Ā Ā 

C. polykomos

0.667

6

15

Pongidae

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 
Ā 

Pan

Ā Ā Ā Ā 
Ā Ā 

P. troglodytes

0.648

8

26

  1. The 15 primate species with the highest degree of niche overlap, and the number of points used in creation of the model.