Table 3 Proportion of aquatic habitats positive for Cx. quinquefasciatus in different LULC sites. This table summarizes the proportion of aquatic habitats positive for Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae in relation to the land use land cover change that has occurred
Village | LULC change | Number of LULC Habitats | Percent positive for Culex larvae |
|---|---|---|---|
Kangichiri | Rice field to Fallow | 33 | 17.7% |
| Â | Fallow to rice field | 43 | 23.1% |
| Â | Built environment to fallow | 30 | 16.1% |
| Â | Fallow to built environment | 31 | 16.7% |
| Â | Built environment to rice field | 23 | 12.4% |
| Â | Rice field to built environment | 26 | 14.0% |
| Â | Total | 186 | 100 |
Kiuria | Rice field to Fallow | 42 | 24.0% |
| Â | Fallow to rice field | 21 | 12.0% |
| Â | Built environment to fallow | 30 | 17.1% |
| Â | Fallow to built environment | 34 | 19.4% |
| Â | Built environment to rice field | 20 | 11.4% |
| Â | Rice field to built environment | 28 | 16.0% |
| Â | Total | 175 | 100 |
Rurumi | Rice field to Fallow | 27 | 15.6% |
| Â | Fallow to rice field | 49 | 28.3% |
| Â | Built environment to fallow | 19 | 11.0% |
| Â | Fallow to built environment | 31 | 17.9% |
| Â | Built environment to rice field | 24 | 13.9% |
| Â | Rice field to built environment | 23 | 13.3% |
| Â | Total | 173 | 100 |