Skip to main content

Table 4 Association between area-level characteristics and tertiles of block group crime rate 1999–2001*

From: Violent crime exposure classification and adverse birth outcomes: a geographically-defined cohort study

Mean percent (standard deviation)

Tertile 1: (0.0 – 0.005)

Tertile 2: (0.006 – 0.019)

Tertile 3: (0.022 – 0.21)

F-test P-value

Black Non-Hispanic

9.7 (11.5)

24.3 (21.5)

52.0 (32.2)

P < 0.001

Poverty**

6.1 (5.4)

11.7 (9.9)

22.1 (14.8)

P < 0.001

Female headed HH***

7.1 (4.9)

12.2 (7.9)

21.9 (17.5)

P < 0.001

HH income <$30,000

19.5 (10.3)

30.1 (15.3)

47.4 (18.1)

P < 0.001

Public assistance

1.2 (1.4)

1.5 (2.8)

5.3 (5.5)

P < 0.001

No car

1.4 (1.4)

1.9 (2.4)

8.0 (12.4)

P < 0.001

High housing costs****

23.0 (12.7)

24.5 (10.2)

27.0 (10.1)

P = 0.29

Unemployment

2.3 (2.3)

4.2 (5.2)

9.8 (11.7)

P < 0.001

Low education*****

6.4 (7.7)

11.5 (9.1)

25.5 (14.6)

P < 0.001

Median home value******

22.0 (88.3)

17.4 (11.1)

12.0 (60.7)

P < 0.001

  1. * Percent of block group characteristics and F-statistic P-value comparing mean values for block group crime rate tertiles in Raleigh crime report area, 1999–2001.
  2. ** Percent households reporting living under the 1999 federal poverty line
  3. *** Percent households headed by females with dependent children
  4. **** Specified owner or renter costs in excess of 50% of income
  5. ***** Less than 12 years of education among adults 25 years or older
  6. ****** Median household value(× $10000.00)