Skip to main content

Table 6 Recovered odds ratios by TIGER geocoding with variable offsets and number of people in a sample. Estimates and power are based on 10,000 simulated samples.

From: Geocoding accuracy and the recovery of relationships between environmental exposures and health

Number of people in sample TIGER geocoding with the following offsets in feet. Estimates Power (%)
   Mean Odds Ratio 95%CI  
316 0 1.18 0.50–1.82 19.0
  200 1.18 0.50–1.84 19.6
  400 1.22 0.50–1.91 21.4
  600 1.20 0.50–1.84 21.7
  800 1.23 0.49–1.91 22.4
474 0 1.19 0.69–1.66 24.3
  200 1.19 0.68–1.67 26.3
  400 1.24 0.68–1.74 28.9
  600 1.22 0.69–1.68 28.3
  800 1.24 0.68–1.74 28.8
632 0 1.20 0.78–1.56 30.2
  200 1.20 0.79–1.58 33.1
  400 1.24 0.79–1.66 35.9
  600 1.22 0.80–1.60 35.6
  800 1.25 0.79–1.65 36.2
790 0 1.20 0.86–1.51 35.5
  200 1.20 0.86–1.52 38.7
  400 1.25 0.86–1.60 41.7
  600 1.23 0.87–1.55 41.2
  800 1.25 0.86–1.60 42.7
948 0 1.20 0.90–1.48 40.1
  200 1.21 0.90–1.49 44.0
  400 1.25 0.92–1.56 47.5
  600 1.23 0.92–1.51 46.9
  800 1.25 0.92–1.56 48.1
1106 0 1.21 0.94–1.46 44.9
  200 1.21 0.94–1.46 49.1
  400 1.25 0.96–1.54 53.2
  600 1.23 0.96–1.49 52.9
  800 1.26 0.96–1.54 53.8
1264 0 1.20 0.95–1.43 49.7
  200 1.21 0.96–1.44 53.4
  400 1.25 0.97–1.51 57.3
  600 1.23 0.97–1.47 56.6
  800 1.25 0.98–1.51 58.0
1422 0 1.21 0.98–1.41 53.6
  200 1.21 0.98–1.42 58.3
  400 1.25 1.00–1.49 62.8
  600 1.23 1.00–1.45 62.4
  800 1.26 1.01–1.49 63.4
1581 0 1.21 1.00–1.40 57.5
  200 1.21 1.00–1.41 62.1
  400 1.25 1.02–1.48 66.1
  600 1.24 1.02–1.44 65.9
  800 1.26 1.03–1.48 67.5