Skip to main content

Table 4 Spearman rank correlations between measures of the accessibility of hospitals by aggregation method

From: Comparing alternative approaches to measuring the geographical accessibility of urban health services: Distance types and aggregation-error issues

  

Accessibility measures using shortest network distance

Accessibility measures using shortest network time

Hospitals

 

CTCa

WDAb

WBlc

CTCa

WDAb

WBlc

Minimum network distance

CTCa

1.000

  

1.000

  
 

WDAb

0.991

1.000

 

0.987

1.000

0.997

 

WBlc

0.989

0.997

1.000

0.984

0.997

1.000

Average distance to three closest services

CTCa

1.000

  

1.000

  
 

WDAb

0.997

1.000

 

0.995

1.000

 
 

WBlc

0.997

0.999

1.000

0.994

0.999

1.000

Average distance to five closest services

CTCa

1.000

  

1.000

  
 

WDAb

0.998

1.000

 

0.996

1.000

 
 

WBlc

0.998

0.999

1.000

0.995

0.999

1.000

Average distance to all services

CTCa

1.000

  

1.000

  
 

WDAb

0.998

1.000

 

0.995

1.000

 
 

WBlc

0.999

0.999

1.000

0.995

0.998

1.000

Number of services within 500 metres

CTCa

1.000

  

1.000

  
 

WDAb

0.604

1.000

 

0.993

1.000

 
 

WBlc

0.588

0.838

1.000

0.992

0.999

1.000

Number of services within 1000 metres

CTCa

1.000

  

1.000

  
 

WDAb

0.828

1.000

 

0.990

1.000

 
 

WBlc

0.776

0.924

1.000

0.990

0.998

1.000

Number of services within 2000 metres

CTCa

1.000

  

1.000

  
 

WDAb

0.916

1.000

 

0.978

1.000

 
 

WBlc

0.898

0.968

1.000

0.976

0.996

1.000

Gravity model with α = 1

CTCa

1.000

  

1.000

  
 

WDAb

0.994

1.000

 

0.992

1.000

 
 

WBlc

0.993

0.998

1.000

0.990

0.997

1.000

Gravity model with α = 1.5

CTCa

1.000

  

1.000

  
 

WDAb

0.993

1.000

 

0.990

1.000

 
 

WBlc

0.992

0.996

1.000

0.988

0.996

1.000

Gravity model with α = 2

CTCa

1.000

  

1.000

  
 

WDAb

0.991

1.000

 

0.987

1.000

 
 

WBlc

0.991

0.995

1.000

0.986

0.994

1.000

  1. a Aggregation method based on census tract centroid (the least accurate method).
  2. b Aggregation method based on the population-weighted mean of the accessibility measure for dissemination areas within census tracts.
  3. c Aggregation method based on the population-weighted mean of the accessibility measure for blocks within census tracts (the most accurate method).