Table 2 Bayesian-smoothed chlamydia incidence rates among the ten counties with the highest incidence in Texas, 2004 and 2005
2004 | 2005 | Relative change 2004–2005 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County | Rate | Z-value | County | Rate | Z-value | County | % change | Z-value |
Bell | 778 | 4.50 | Falls | 1126 | 6.72 | Gaines | 173 | 3.71 |
Falls | 740 | 4.18 | Bell | 866 | 4.72 | Hunt | 99 | 2.56 |
Hale | 679 | 3.65 | Potter | 668 | 3.20 | La Salle | 97 | 2.52 |
Potter | 652 | 3.42 | Kleberg | 614 | 2.78 | Hamilton | 79 | 2.17 |
Nolan | 568 | 2.70 | Hays | 539 | 2.20 | Sherman | 72 | 2.03 |
Taylor | 563 | 2.66 | La Salle | 524 | 2.09 | Martin | 71 | 2.01 |
Kleberg | 561 | 2.65 | Gregg | 505 | 1.94 | Garza | 70 | 1.99 |
Lubbock | 519 | 2.29 | Lubbock | 503 | 1.93 | Van Zandt | 69 | 1.95 |
McLennan | 517 | 2.27 | Taylor | 501 | 1.92 | Mitchell | 66 | 1.90 |
Coke | 513 | 2.16 | Bexar | 487 | 1.81 | Upton | 64 | 1.85 |