Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of PEA scenarios (100 model runs each) for changing patterns of pesticide application

From: Spatial modeling of personalized exposure dynamics: the case of pesticide use in small-scale agricultural production landscapes of the developing world

Individual Non-weighted Low safety High safety
(residence)
1 (59) 0.21 0.23
0.19
0.33 0.36
0.29
0.56 0.62
0.49
0.18 0.30 0.50 0.12 0.22 0.38
2 (39) 0.20 0.23
0.18
0.30 0.33
0.26
0.53 0.60
0.46
0.18 0.27 0.47 0.12 0.21 0.36
3 (21) 0.22 0.26
0.19
0.34 0.39
0.29
0.55 0.64
0.47
0.19 0.31 0.52 0.13 0.26 0.44
4 (122) 0.30 0.33
0.27
0.42 0.47
0.38
0.71 0.78
0.64
0.26 0.39 0.67 0.18 0.32 0.57
5 (184) 0.14 0.16
0.12
0.20 0.22
0.17
0.32 0.38
0.27
0.12 0.18 0.29 0.08 0.14 0.23
6 (133) 0.10 0.12
0.08
0.14 0.17
0.11
0.32 0.40
0.23
0.08 0.12 0.30 0.06 0.10 0.25
  1. = mean of exposure magnitudes, = mean of frequency values (proportional count; 1.0 = 192 time steps), = mean of duration values (proportional count of subsequent time steps; 1.0 = 32 time steps). In the scenario "non-weighted" lower confidence limits (LCL; subscripted) and upper confidence limits (UCL; superscripted) of the means (95% confidence level) are given; these ranges would be comparable for the means in both safety scenarios.