Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of PEA scenarios (100 model runs each) for varying individual patterns of movement

From: Spatial modeling of personalized exposure dynamics: the case of pesticide use in small-scale agricultural production landscapes of the developing world

Individual Non-weighted Low safety High safety
(residence)
1 (59) 0.25 0.25
0.24
0.37 0.38
0.37
0.60 0.62
0.58
0.21 0.33 0.55 0.14 0.28 0.42
2 (39) 0.28 0.29
0.28
0.41 0.42
0.41
0.57 0.59
0.55
0.24 0.38 0.52 0.17 0.31 0.42
3 (21) 0.31 0.31
0.30
0.47 0.47
0.46
0.76 0.77
0.75
0.27 0.42 0.69 0.18 0.33 0.53
4 (122) 0.35 0.35
0.34
0.53 0.53
0.52
0.78 0.79
0.76
0.29 0.48 0.69 0.20 0.38 0.56
5 (184) 0.24 0.24
0.23
0.38 0.38
0.37
0.47 0.49
0.45
0.22 0.34 0.41 0.15 0.27 0.32
6 (133) 0.13 0.13
0.12
0.20 0.20
0.19
0.31 0.33
0.30
0.11 0.17 0.28 0.08 0.13 0.20
  1. = mean of exposure magnitudes, = mean of frequency values (proportional count; 1.0 = 192 time steps), = mean of duration values (proportional count of subsequent time steps; 1.0 = 32 time steps). In the scenario "non-weighted" lower confidence limits (LCL; subscripted) and upper confidence limits (UCL; superscripted) of the means (95% confidence level) are given; these ranges would be comparable for the means in both safety scenarios.