|
Model 1
|
Access as number of shopping opportunities within 3 network 3 miles
|
|---|
| |
Fresh fruits
|
Overall fruits
|
Fresh vegetables
|
Overall vegetables
|
|---|
|
Deprivation
|
b (SE)
|
b (SE)
|
b (SE)
|
b (SE)
|
|---|
|
High
|
0.98 (0.21)‡
|
1.58 (0.34)‡
|
0.75 (0.18)‡
|
1.21 (0.25)‡
|
|
Medium
|
0.11 (0.18)
|
0.12 (0.30)
|
-0.02(0.16)
|
0.10 (0.22)
|
|
R2
|
0.633
|
0.497
|
0.660
|
0.562
|
|
P
|
<0.001
|
<0.001
|
<0.001
|
<0.001
|
|
Model 2
|
Access as number of shopping opportunities within 5 miles
|
| |
Fresh fruits
|
Overall fruits
|
Fresh vegetables
|
Overall vegetables
|
|
Vehicle ownership
|
b (SE)
|
b (SE)
|
b (SE)
|
b (SE)
|
|
Low
|
0.47 (0.25)
|
1.05 (0.38)†
|
0.32 (0.21)
|
0.76 (0.29)†
|
|
Medium
|
-0.03 (0.24)
|
0.28 (0.38)
|
0.07(0.21)
|
0.11 (0.29)
|
|
R2
|
0.402
|
0.267
|
0.438
|
0.314
|
|
P
|
<0.001
|
<0.001
|
<0.001
|
<0.001
|
- NOTE: In models 1 and 2, the four equations were simultaneously estimated, controlling for population density. In model 1, deprivation entered as categorical variable; low deprivation is referent group. In model 2, vehicle ownership entered as categorical variable; high vehicle ownership is referent group. In both models, population density entered as continuous. Results are reported as multivariate-adjusted b (SE). Statistically significant variables are indicated as: *<0.05 †<0.01 ‡<0.001
