|
Model 1
|
Access as network distance to the nearest
|
|---|
| |
Fresh fruits
|
Overall fruits
|
Fresh vegetables
|
Overall vegetables
|
|---|
|
Deprivation
|
b (SE)
|
b (SE)
|
b (SE)
|
b (SE)
|
|---|
|
High
|
-4.47 (0.134)‡
|
-3.09 (1.02)†
|
-3.82 (1.44)†
|
-2.91 (1.0)†
|
|
Medium
|
-0.86 (1.19)
|
-0.33 (0.91)
|
-0.75(1.28)
|
-0.55 (0.89)
|
|
R2
|
0.303
|
0.264
|
0.291
|
0.243
|
|
P
|
<0.001
|
<0.001
|
<0.001
|
<0.001
|
|
Model 2
|
Access as network distance to the nearest
|
| |
Fresh fruits
|
Overall fruits
|
Fresh vegetables
|
Overall vegetables
|
|
Vehicle ownership
|
b (SE)
|
b (SE)
|
b (SE)
|
b (SE)
|
|
Low
|
-2.26 (1.21)
|
-3.21 (0.90)‡
|
-1.93 (1.33)
|
-2.56 (0.89)†
|
|
Medium
|
1.23 (1.21)
|
-2.07 (0.90)‡
|
1.29(1.32)
|
-0.66 (0.89)
|
|
R2
|
0.269
|
0.276
|
0.268
|
0.233
|
|
P
|
<0.001
|
<0.001
|
<0.001
|
<0.001
|
- NOTE: In models 1 and 2, the four equations were simultaneously estimated, controlling for population density. In model 1, deprivation entered as categorical variable; low deprivation is referent group. In model 2, vehicle ownership entered as categorical variable; high vehicle ownership is referent group. In both models, population density entered as continuous. Results are reported as multivariate-adjusted b (SE). Statistically significant variables are indicated as: *<0.05 †<0.01 ‡<0.001
