Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparing "new" diabetes patient addresses to their closest background neighbourhood rate node

From: Spatial patterns of diabetes related health problems for vulnerable populations in Los Angeles

Patient D1&2 neuro renal other dx D1&2L neuro L renal L other L dxL
0 0 0 0 0 35.56 0 0 0 0.38 35.59
1 28.89 5.46 11.13 27.45 229.47 34.11 6.46 9.71 29.54 265.42
2 3.46 11.26 0 0.56 115.82 5.74 4.62 0 0.9 93.04
3 13.78 2.36 11.41 3.52 127.99 14.72 1.48 13.24 12.35 156.5
4 3.87 13.56 7.67 1.88 195.79 4.21 13.69 7.54 2 193.58
5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 14.15 1.41 12.75 7.21 162.69 22.44 0.37 22.08 5.4 221.37
7 0 0 0.78 0 3.13 0 0 0.55 0.55 2.73
8 35.56 0 2.87 1.72 151.45 33.46 0 1.96 0.6 140.37
9 15.31 14.35 20.14 50.47 219.27 13.55 17.94 14.22 51.28 209.29
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 0.29 0 1.4 1.04 8.87 2.2 0 2.32 3.91 19.16
12 4.3 15.44 0.41 19.08 177.6 3.46 14.1 0.17 17.12 193.58
13 34.46 0 2.32 0.2 142.32 29.68 0 4.93 0.2 145.33
14 3.15 0 41.98 19.98 236.46 1.54 0 45.97 22.64 233.78
15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16 0 9.81 2.61 8.43 182.39 12.81 10.43 2.37 8.47 198.44
17 1.08 0 45.57 3.69 184.07 0.56 0 50.32 2.44 172.26
18 18.52 6.37 17.71 27.88 153.29 14.3 13.61 13.3 28.36 141.4
19 1.03 40.23 0 14.3 155.62 0.94 39.62 0 13.37 160.7
20 0.32 0 46.73 21.16 174.07 0.62 0 49.88 21.2 178.55
21 18.93 0 9.43 1.46 135.5 21.64 0 10.43 2.05 156.81
22 5.51 2.07 3.44 2.07 46.69 4.5 1.47 3.03 3.03 38.46
23 0 12.91 1.47 1.95 186.82 10.6 12.53 2.78 4.74 202.97
24 4.1 0.57 27 14.21 133.7 4.17 0.56 28.84 21.17 145.65
25 0 0 0.31 22.99 232.07 0 0 7.54 5.83 239.24
26 12.98 0 0 0 55.39 5.12 0 0.34 0 21.45
27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
28 9.19 18.57 0.88 2.04 153.52 9.8 18.14 0.73 5.07 157.25
  1. This table can be interpreted in the following way. Patient 20 lives in a neighbourhood (defined by DMAP output) where of 1000 diabetic patients using the ED, 174 had a diabetes related condition as their primary reason for the visit, and more specifically where 46 per 1000 patients suffer primarily from renal problems. For ease of interpretation, any rate for the four conditions under investigation exceeding 25/1000 are in bold. The "dx" value is taken from the surface generated in Figure 1. In addition, for the sake of completion, the same rate results are reported for the larger boundary study area (the red box in Figure 1).