Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive statistics for environmental indicators, general health and area characteristics, for English Lower-layer Super Output Areas included in analyses (2011, n = 31,672)

From: Beyond greenspace: an ecological study of population general health and indicators of natural environment type and quality

Variable

Mean

SD e

IQR e

Min

Max

Landcover types (% LSOA area coverage) a

Broadleaf woodland

4.37

-

5.81

0.00

88.94

Coniferous woodland

0.56

-

0.00

0.00

63.97

Arable/horticultural

13.59

-

19.93

0.00

95.53

Improved grassland

15.98

-

22.28

0.00

85.79

Semi-natural grassland

2.41

-

3.02

0.00

69.02

Mountain, heath & bog

0.67

-

0.00

0.00

72.65

Saltwater

0.03

-

0.00

0.00

38.49

Freshwater

0.49

-

0.00

0.00

77.65

Coastal

0.31

-

0.00

0.00

91.59

Urban/suburban

61.59

-

61.68

0.11

100.00

Environmental quality indicators

Landcover Shannon Diversity Index (2007)b

0.93

0.44

0.65

0.00

2.37

Bird species richness 2008 (number of species)

87.77

10.79

14

36

141

Freshwater ecological quality indicator (2011)c

-0.10

0.39

0.43

-1.97

0.99

Protected/designated areas kernel density indicator (10 km search radius)d

81.40

-

63.42

0.00

1220.50

Protected/designated areas kernel density indicator (20 km search radius)d

97.50

-

78.09

1.00

1007.71

General health (census 2011)

Prevalence good/very good health (Directly age/sex standardised %)

80.84

5.72

8.29

59.42

94.61

Prevalence bad/very bad health (Directly age/sex standardised %)

5.79

2.81

3.80

0.74

18.75

Area characteristics

LSOA area (km2)

4.04

-

1.03

0.02

683.78

Urban

n = 26,186

    

Town/fringe

n = 2,986

    

Rural

n = 2,500

    
  1. aIn each case, descriptive data are presented for each land cover type across all 31,672 LSOAs e.g. mean broadleaf woodland coverage per LSOA is 4.37% by area.
  2. b.A score of 0 on the Shannon Diversity Index indicates that an LSOA is 100% covered by a single land cover type; as the number of different land covers and their relative abundance increases within the LSOA, so does the Index (e.g. an LSOA 60% urban and 40% broadleaf has a higher index than one 90% urban, 10% broadleaf).
  3. cThe freshwater quality indicator is interpolated from sample sites where overall ecological quality is scored from -2 (Bad) to 2 (High).
  4. dThe protected/designated area density indicators are relative measures with no meaningful unit; derivation is described in the text.
  5. eSD = Standard Deviation; IQR = Inter-Quartile Range. Where distribution is substantially asymmetric the SD is not stated.