Skip to main content

Table 6 Loadings of indicators on corresponding marginalization dimensions from Model (1)

From: Do marginalized neighbourhoods have less healthy retail food environments? An analysis using Bayesian spatial latent factor and hurdle models

ID

Indicator

Parameter

Posterior mean (95 % credible interval)

Loadings on residential instability

 1

% of living alone (R1)

δ1

1

 2

% of youth population aged 5–15 (R2)

δ2

−0.984 (−1.081, −0.889)

 3

Crowding: average number of persons per dwelling (R3)

δ3

−1.164 (−1.253, −1.078)

 4

% of multi-unit housing (R4)

δ4

0.972 (0.872, 1.074)

 5

% of the population that is married/common-law (R5)

δ5

−1.081 (−1.178, −0.987)

 6

% of dwellings that are owned (R6)

δ6

−1.116 (−1.212, −1.025)

 7

% of residential mobility (same house as 5 years ago) (R7)

δ7

0.491 (0.383, 0.604)

Loadings on material deprivation

 8

% 25+ without certificate, diploma, or degree (M1)

δ8

1

 9

% of lone-parent families (M2)

δ9

0.747 (0.621, 0.875)

 10

% of government transfer payment (M3)

δ10

1.194 (1.073, 1.319)

 11

% of unemployment 15+ (M4)

δ11

0.313 (0.182, 0.447)

 12

% of below low income cut-off (M5)

δ12

0.688 (0.559, 0.818)

 13

% of homes needing major repair (M6)

δ13

0.738 (0.616, 0.862)

Loadings on dependency

 14

% of seniors (65+) (D1)

δ14

1

 15

Dependency ratio [(0–14) + (65+)]/(15–64) (D2)

δ15

0.727 (0.597, 0.859)

 16

Labor force participation rate (aged 15+) (D3)

δ16

−0.751 (−0.877, −0.629)

Loadings on ethnic concentration

 17

% of 5-year recent immigrants (E1)

δ17

1

 18

% of visible minority (E2)

δ18

1.53 (1.352, 1.72)