Skip to main content

Table 1 Socio-demographic characteristics of the sample

From: Is gentrification all bad? Positive association between gentrification and individual’s perceived neighborhood collective efficacy in Montreal, Canada

 

Unweighted total

(n = 2433)

Weighted totala

(n = 2432.37)

Gender (%)

 Female

61.78

51.71

 Male

38.22

48.29

Age (mean, SD)

41.39, 13.34

40.73, 14.09

Age (%)

 15–24

12.00

16.12

 25–34

21.58

20.66

 35–44

23.59

20.84

 45–54

22.44

20.92

 55+

20.39

21.46

Marital status (%)

 Single

36.48

37.95

 Married

29.81

29.37

 Separated

3.05

2.82

 Common-law

15.81

15.86

 Divorced

13.13

12.39

 Widowed

1.73

1.61

Education (%)

 Less high school

15.30

15.99

 High school

11.51

12.13

 Post-high school

73.19

71.88

Immigrant (%)

 No

75.02

75.14

 Yes

24.98

24.86

Primary language (%)

 English

21.90

20.59

 French

54.25

55.36

 English + French

6.59

6.56

 Neither English nor French

17.25

17.50

Caucasian (%)

 No

18.69

18.46

 Yes

81.31

81.54

Dwelling owned by a household member (%)

 No

61.47

61.15

 Yes

38.53

38.85

Held a job in the past 12 months (%)

 No

22.60

21.41

 Yes

77.40

78.59

Household size (mean, SD)

2.50, 1.39

2.49, 1.36

Household income (mean, SD)

$57,68, $49,72

$59,06, $49,85

Personal income (mean, SD)

$32,53, $31,20

$33,19, $33,15

  1. aThe data was weighted for sex and age