Skip to main content

Table 3 Multilevel linear regression model for the relationship between type of resident and collective efficacy adjusted for neighborhood and socio-demographic characteristics

From: Is gentrification all bad? Positive association between gentrification and individual’s perceived neighborhood collective efficacy in Montreal, Canada

 

β

95% CI

P Value

Constant

31.09

(27.13, 35.06)

0.00

Age

−0.02

(−0.04, 0.01)

0.18

Sex (ref. male)

 Female

−1.09

(−1.72, −0.47)

0.00

Education (ref. Bachelor’s degree)

 Highschool or less

0.44

(−0.42, 1.30)

0.31

 Post-secondary education of a lower level than a bachelor’s degree

0.59

(−0.14, 1.32)

0.12

Neighborhood poverty

0.08

(−0.30, 0.47)

0.67

Type of resident (ref. Moved into a gentrifying neighborhood)

 Original resident of a gentrifying neighborhood

−1.25

(−3.36, 0.85)

0.24

 Moved into a neighborhood that did not gentrify

−1.72

(−3.15, −0.29)

0.02

 Original resident of a neighborhood that did not gentrify

−1.96

(−3.54, −0.37)

0.02

Household income

−0.86

(−1.57, −0.15)

0.02

First language (ref. first language is French)

 First language is not French

−1.10

(−1.76, −0.44)

0.00

Tenure (ref. owner)

 Renter

2.69

(1.96, 3.42)

0.00

Random effects

 Tract variance

2.44

(1.32, 4.51)

0.00

  1. Significance level: P = 0.05