Risk of late cervical cancer screening in the Paris region according to social deprivation and medical densities in daily visited neighborhoods

Table 5 Association between late cervical screening and the two cumulative exposure scores from the daily visited neighborhoods (SIRS 2010; n = 1817)

	N	Model 1	Model 1 + 2	Model 1 + 2
		aOR^a (95 CI)	aOR^a (95 CI)	aOR^a (95 CI)
Cumulative exposure: income
High-income neighborhoods only	1095	Ref.		Ref.
Different types of neighborhoods	171	1.05 (0.68–1.62)		1.02 (0.67–1.55)
Middle–income neighborhoods only	232	0.95 (0.55–1.63)		0.84 (0.51–1.38)
Low-income neighborhoods only	319	1.97 (1.40–2.76)		1.77 (1.21–2.60)
Cumulative exposure: medical density^b
High-density neighborhoods only	1057		Ref.	Ref.
Different types of neighborhoods	264		1.58 (1.15–2.22)	1.35 (0.91–1.99)
Intermediate-density neighborhoods only	265		1.12 (0.70–1.78)	1.10 (0.69–1.77)
Low-density neighborhoods only	231		1.60 (1.15–2.22)	1.56 (1.05–2.33)

^a Adjusted for age, relationship status, health coverage, level of education and nationality
^b General practitioners and gynecologists

ISSN: 1476-072X