Skip to main content

Table 2 Cluster statistics for counties with the higher rates

From: Differentiating anomalous disease intensity with confounding variables in space

Rank order

County

Rate

B1

P value1

Risk level

B2

P value2

1

Anson

9.55

 

H1

 

2

Northampton

6.33

0

1

H1

0

1

3

Washington

5.05

0

1

H1

0

\(\text{9.97}{\times10}^{-1}\)

4

Halifax

4.99

1

\(\text{2.68}{\times10}^{-1}\)

H1

1

\(\text{2.20}{\times10}^{-1}\)

5

Hertford

4.82

2

\(\text{7.27}{\times10}^{-2}\)

H1

2

\(\text{4.87}{{\times10}}^{-2}\)

6

Hoke

4.69

2

\(\text{1.53}{\times10}^{-1}\)

H1

2

\(\text{1.06}{\times10}^{-1}\)

7

Greene

4.60

2

\(\text{2.65}{\times10}^{-1}\)

H1

2

\(\text{1.89}{\times10}^{-1}\)

8

Bertie

4.53

6

\(\text{3.21}{\times10}^{-3}\)

H1

4

\(\text{2.34}{\times10}^{-2}\)

9

Bladen

4.49

6

\(\text{9.06}{\times10}^{-3}\)

H2

4

\(\text{4.99}{\times10}^{-2}\)

10

Columbus

4.48

7

\(\text{7.43}{\times10}^{-3}\)

H2

5

\(\text{3.06}{\times10}^{-2}\)

11

Swain

4.44

7

\(\text{1.85}{\times10}^{-2}\)

H2

5

\(\text{6.13}{\times10}^{-2}\)

12

Warren

4.13

8

\(\text{1.61}{\times10}^{-2}\)

H2

5

\(\text{1.11}{\times10}^{-1}\)

13

Rutherford

4.01

8

\(\text{3.63}{\times10}^{-2}\)

H2

5

\(\text{1.85}{\times10}^{-1}\)

14

Robeson

3.93

11

\(\text{5.73}{\times10}^{-3}\)

H2

8

\(\text{2.62}{\times10}^{-2}\)

15

Lincoln

3.61

11

\(\text{1.43}{\times10}^{-2}\)

H2

8

\(\text{5.25}{\times10}^{-2}\)

16

Rockingham

3.60

11

\(\text{3.27}{\times10}^{-2}\)

H2

8

\(\text{9.45}{\times10}^{-2}\)

17

Scotland

3.55

13

\(\text{1.61}{\times10}^{-2}\)

H2

9

\(\text{8.30}{\times10}^{-2}\)

18

Pender

3.26

15

\(\text{8.43}{\times10}^{-3}\)

H2

9

\(\text{1.42}{\times10}^{-1}\)

19

Wilson

2.97

16

\(\text{9.73}{\times10}^{-3}\)

H3

10

\(\text{1.30}{\times10}^{-1}\)

20

Lenoir

2.79

17

\(\text{1.15}{\times10}^{-2}\)

H3

11

\(\text{1.22}{\times10}^{-1}\)

21

Alamance

2.78

18

\(\text{1.42}{\times10}^{-2}\)

H3

11

\(\text{1.97}{\times10}^{-1}\)

22

Pitt

2.75

21

\(\text{4.54}{\times10}^{-3}\)

H3

13

\(\text{1.16}{\times10}^{-1}\)

23

Edgecombe

2.73

24

\(\text{1.52}{\times10}^{-3}\)

H3

16

\(\text{3.80}{\times10}^{-2}\)

24

Wayne

2.71

27

\(\text{4.92}{\times10}^{-4}\)

H3

19

\(\text{1.19}{\times10}^{-2}\)

25

Madison

2.61

27

\(\text{1.59}{\times10}^{-3}\)

 

19

\(\text{2.47}{\times10}^{-2}\)