Skip to main content

Table 4 Cluster statistics for counties with the higher SMR

From: Differentiating anomalous disease intensity with confounding variables in space

Rank order County SMR SIDS E(SIDS) B1 P value1 B2 P value2
1 Anson 3.45 15 4.35   
2 Rutherford 2.47 12 4.86 0 1 0 1
3 Lincoln 2.33 8 3.43 0 1 0 1
4 Madison 2.16 2 0.92 0 1 0 1
5 Northampton 2.01 9 4.47 0 1 0 1
6 Washington 1.97 5 2.54 0 1 0 1
7 Swain 1.95 3 1.54 0 1 0 1
8 Columbus 1.94 15 7.72 0 1 0 1
9 Bladen 1.88 8 4.26 1 \(\text{8.61}{\times10}^{-1}\) 1 \(\text{7.89}{\times10}^{-1}\)
10 McDowell 1.874 5 2.67 2 \(\text{6.73}{\times10}^{-1}\) 2 \(\text{5.42}{\times10}^{-1}\)
11 Rockingham 1.873 16 8.54 2 \(\text{7.83}{\times10}^{-1}\) 2 \(\text{6.59}{\times10}^{-1}\)
12 Transylvania 1.83 3 1.64 2 \(\text{8.67}{\times10}^{-1}\) 2 \(\text{7.60}{\times10}^{-1}\)
13 Halifax 1.72 18 10.46 3 \(\text{7.67}{\times10}^{-1}\) 3 \(\text{6.10}{\times10}^{-1}\)
14 Hertford 1.66 7 4.22 4 \(\text{6.78}{\times10}^{-1}\) 4 \(\text{4.88}{\times10}^{-1}\)
15 Greene 1.65 4 2.43 4 \(\text{7.90}{\times10}^{-1}\) 4 \(\text{6.10}{\times10}^{-1}\)
16 Hoke 1.61 7 4.35 4 \(\text{8.75}{\times10}^{-1}\) 4 \(\text{7.22}{\times10}^{-1}\)
17 Cherokee 1.53 2 1.31 5 \(\text{8.33}{\times10}^{-1}\) 4 \(\text{8.14}{\times10}^{-1}\)
18 Onslow 1.52 29 19.08 5 \(\text{9.05}{\times10}^{-1}\) 4 \(\text{8.84}{\times10}^{-1}\)
19 Bertie 1.51 6 3.98 9 \(\text{4.70}{\times10}^{-1}\) 6 \(\text{6.91}{\times10}^{-1}\)
20 Alamance 1.48 13 8.81 10 \(\text{4.64}{\times10}^{-1}\) 6 \(\text{7.92}{\times10}^{-1}\)
21 Henderson 1.44 5 3.48 12 \(\text{3.34}{\times10}^{-1}\) 8 \(\text{6.06}{\times10}^{-1}\)
22 Scotland 1.37 8 5.83 13 \(\text{3.45}{\times10}^{-1}\) 9 \(\text{5.76}{\times10}^{-1}\)
23 Pender 1.34 4 2.97 16 \(\text{1.72}{\times10}^{-1}\) 9 \(\text{6.95}{\times10}^{-1}\)
24 Carteret 1.328 5 3.766 17 \(\text{1.91}{\times10}^{-1}\) 9 \(\text{7.96}{\times10}^{-1}\)
25 Stanly 1.325 5 3.772 18 \(\text{2.13}{\times10}^{-1}\) 10 \(\text{7.82}{\times10}^{-1}\)