Skip to main content

Table 5 Cluster statistics for counties with the lower SMR

From: Differentiating anomalous disease intensity with confounding variables in space

Rank order

County

SMR

SIDS

E(SIDS)

Live birth

B1

P value1

Risk level

B2

P value2

100

Alexander

0

0

1.92

1333

-

 

LS1

-

 

99

Gates

0

0

1.16

420

0

1

LS1

0

1

98

Macon

0

0

0.97

797

0

1

LS1

0

1

97

Yancey

0

0

0.95

770

0

1

LS1

0

1

96

Avery

0

0

0.94

781

0

1

LS1

1

\(\text{3.41}{\times10}^{-1}\)

95

Mitchell

0

0

0.80

671

2

\(\text{1.53}{\times10}^{-1}\)

LS1

3

\(\text{2.04}{\times10}^{-2}\)

94

Hyde

0

0

0.75

338

2

\(\text{2.65}{\times10}^{-1}\)

LS1

3

\(\text{4.57}{\times10}^{-2}\)

93

Dare

0

0

0.73

521

3

\(\text{1.47}{\times10}^{-1}\)

LS1

3

\(\text{9.06}{\times10}^{-2}\)

92

Camden

0

0

0.64

286

4

\(\text{9.29}{\times10}^{-2}\)

LS1

3

\(\text{1.59}{\times10}^{-1}\)

91

Alleghany

0

0

0.61

487

4

\(\text{1.70}{\times10}^{-1}\)

LS1

3

\(\text{2.53}{\times10}^{-1}\)

90

Graham

0

0

0.599

415

5

\(\text{1.26}{\times10}^{-1}\)

LS1

4

\(\text{1.62}{\times10}^{-1}\)

89

Tyrrell

0

0

0.598

248

6

\(\text{9.92}{\times10}^{-2}\)

LS1

5

\(\text{1.11}{\times10}^{-1}\)

88

Clay

0

0

0.34

284

7

\(\text{8.36}{\times10}^{-2}\)

LS1

7

\(\text{3.31}{\times10}^{-2}\)

87

Rowan

0.36

3

8.24

4606

7

\(\text{1.52}{\times10}^{-1}\)

LS2

7

\(\text{6.33}{\times10}^{-2}\)

86

Forsyth

0.41

10

24.34

11,858

7

\(\text{2.50}{\times10}^{-1}\)

LS2

7

\(\text{1.14}{\times10}^{-1}\)

85

Cabarrus

0.42

3

7.12

4099

8

\(\text{2.30}{\times10}^{-1}\)

LS2

8

\(\text{9.45}{\times10}^{-2}\)

84

Stokes

0.43

1

2.34

1612

9

\(\text{2.17}{\times10}^{-1}\)

LS2

9

\(\text{8.30}{\times10}^{-2}\)

83

Martin

0.48

2

4.15

1549

9

\(\text{3.34}{\times10}^{-1}\)

LS2

9

\(\text{1.42}{\times10}^{-1}\)

82

Iredell

0.51

4

7.91

4139

12

\(\text{1.28}{\times10}^{-1}\)

LS2

11

\(\text{6.99}{\times10}^{-2}\)

81

Chowan

0.539

1

1.85

751

13

\(\text{1.34}{\times10}^{-1}\)

LS2

14

\(\text{1.70}{\times10}^{-2}\)

80

Union

0.543

4

7.36

3915

14

\(\text{1.43}{\times10}^{-1}\)

LS2

15

\(\text{1.78}{\times10}^{-2}\)

79

Davie

0.548

1

1.82

1207

17

\(\text{5.72}{\times10}^{-2}\)

LS2

18

\(\text{4.53}{\times10}^{-3}\)

78

Sampson

0.552

4

7.24

3025

17

\(\text{1.10}{\times10}^{-1}\)

 

18

\(\text{1.03}{\times10}^{-2}\)

77

Wake

0.557

16

28.72

14,484

17

\(\text{1.91}{\times10}^{-1}\)

 

18

\(\text{2.24}{\times10}^{-2}\)

76

Franklin

0.558

2

3.58

1399

18

\(\text{2.13}{\times10}^{-1}\)

 

19

\(\text{2.47}{\times10}^{-2}\)