Table 7 Cluster statistics for counties with the smaller poisson probability for Ni ≤ μ(Ai)
From: Differentiating anomalous disease intensity with confounding variables in space
Rank order | County | SMR | SIDS | E(SIDS) | Poisson | B1 | P value1 | Risk level | B2 | P value2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
100 | Forsyth | 0.41 | 10 | 24.34 | \(\text{8.80}{\times10}^{-4}\) | – |  | LP1 | – |  |
99 | Wake | 0.56 | 16 | 28.72 | \(\text{7.23}{\times10}^{-3}\) | 0 | 1 | LP1 | 0 | 1 |
98 | Guilford | 0.69 | 23 | 33.57 | \(\text{3.53}{\times10}^{-2}\) | 1 | \(\text{1.43}{\times10}^{-1}\) | LP1 | 1 | \(\text{1.16}{\times10}^{-1}\) |
97 | Rowan | 0.36 | 3 | 8.24 | \(\text{3.59}{\times10}^{-2}\) | 1 | \(\text{2.68}{\times10}^{-1}\) | LP1 | 1 | \(\text{2.20}{\times10}^{-1}\) |
96 | Cabarrus | 0.42 | 3 | 7.12 | \(\text{7.59}{\times10}^{-2}\) | 2 | \(\text{7.27}{\times10}^{-2}\) | LP1 | 2 | \(\text{4.87}{\times10}^{-2}\) |
95 | Iredell | 0.51 | 4 | 7.91 | \(\text{1.05}{\times10}^{-1}\) | 4 | \(\text{6.70}{\times10}^{-3}\) | LP1 | 3 | \(\text{2.04}{\times10}^{-2}\) |
94 | Catawba | 0.56 | 5 | 8.92 | \(\text{1.21}{\times10}^{-1}\) | 5 | \(\text{4.36}{\times10}^{-3}\) | LP1 | 4 | \(\text{9.59}{\times10}^{-3}\) |
93 | Union | 0.54 | 4 | 7.36 | \(\text{1.43}{\times10}^{-1}\) | 6 | \(\text{3.21}{\times10}^{-3}\) | LP1 | 5 | \(\text{5.45}{\times10}^{-3}\) |
92 | Alexander | 0.00 | 0 | 1.92 | \(\text{1.46}{\times10}^{-1}\) | 8 | \(\text{6.85}{\times10}^{-4}\) | LP1 | 7 | \(\text{8.79}{\times10}^{-4}\) |
91 | Sampson | 0.55 | 4 | 7.24 | \(\text{1.52}{\times10}^{-1}\) | 8 | \(\text{2.25}{\times10}^{-3}\) | LP2 | 7 | \(\text{2.52}{\times10}^{-3}\) |
90 | Gaston | 0.75 | 11 | 14.71 | \(\text{2.05}{\times10}^{-1}\) | 8 | \(\text{6.44}{\times10}^{-3}\) | LP2 | 8 | \(\text{1.98}{\times10}^{-3}\) |
89 | Martin | 0.48 | 2 | 4.15 | \(\text{2.17}{\times10}^{-1}\) | 8 | \(\text{1.61}{\times10}^{-2}\) | LP2 | 8 | \(\text{5.24}{\times10}^{-3}\) |
88 | Cumberland | 0.89 | 38 | 42.62 | \(\text{2.69}{\times10}^{-1}\) | 9 | \(\text{1.46}{\times10}^{-2}\) | LP2 | 9 | \(\text{4.46}{\times10}^{-3}\) |
87 | Durham | 0.83 | 16 | 19.22 | \(\text{2.75}{\times10}^{-1}\) | 10 | \(\text{1.40}{\times10}^{-2}\) | LP2 | 10 | \(\text{3.80}{\times10}^{-3}\) |
86 | Richmond | 0.67 | 4 | 6.00 | \(\text{2.85}{\times10}^{-1}\) | 10 | \(\text{3.25}{\times10}^{-2}\) | LP2 | 10 | \(\text{8.98}{\times10}^{-3}\) |
85 | Buncombe | 0.79 | 9 | 11.38 | \(\text{3.01}{\times10}^{-1}\) | 10 | \(\text{6.75}{\times10}^{-2}\) | LP2 | 10 | \(\text{1.94}{\times10}^{-2}\) |
84 | Franklin | 0.56 | 2 | 3.58 | \(\text{3.05}{\times10}^{-1}\) | 11 | \(\text{6.68}{\times10}^{-2}\) | LP2 | 11 | \(\text{1.80}{\times10}^{-2}\) |
83 | Gates | 0.00 | 0 | 1.16 | \(\text{3.13}{\times10}^{-1}\) | 11 | \(\text{1.25}{\times10}^{-1}\) | LP2 | 11 | \(\text{3.68}{\times10}^{-2}\) |
82 | Orange | 0.69 | 4 | 5.79 | \(\text{3.14}{\times10}^{-1}\) | 12 | \(\text{1.28}{\times10}^{-1}\) | LP2 | 12 | \(\text{3.53}{\times10}^{-2}\) |
81 | Chatham | 0.57 | 2 | 3.50 | \(\text{3.21}{\times10}^{-1}\) | 15 | \(\text{4.36}{\times10}^{-2}\) | LP2 | 15 | \(\text{8.03}{\times10}^{-3}\) |
80 | Stokes | 0.43 | 1 | 2.34 | \(\text{3.22}{\times10}^{-1}\) | 17 | \(\text{2.70}{\times10}^{-2}\) | LP2 | 16 | \(\text{8.58}{\times10}^{-3}\) |
79 | Duplin | 0.70 | 4 | 5.72 | \(\text{3.24}{\times10}^{-1}\) | 18 | \(\text{3.22}{\times10}^{-2}\) | LP3 | 17 | \(\text{9.38}{\times10}^{-3}\) |
78 | Vance | 0.71 | 4 | 5.67 | \(\text{3.32}{\times10}^{-1}\) | 19 | \(\text{3.89}{\times10}^{-2}\) | LP3 | 18 | \(\text{1.03}{\times10}^{-2}\) |
77 | Johnston | 0.77 | 6 | 7.80 | \(\text{3.38}{\times10}^{-1}\) | 22 | \(\text{1.51}{\times10}^{-2}\) | LP3 | 19 | \(\text{1.19}{\times10}^{-2}\) |
76 | Macon | 0.00 | 0 | 0.97 | \(\text{3.78}{\times10}^{-1}\) | 22 | \(\text{3.45}{\times10}^{-2}\) | Â | 19 | \(\text{2.47}{\times10}^{-2}\) |