Skip to main content
Fig. 1 | International Journal of Health Geographics

Fig. 1

From: Evaluating the impact of a small number of areas on spatial estimation

Fig. 1

Example results for simulated datasets for 100 areas under different scenarios. a low spatial autocorrelation and low counts, b high spatial autocorrelation and low counts, c low spatial autocorrelation and high counts, and d high spatial autocorrelation and high counts. Obs, exp, USRF represented observed values, expected values, and underlying spatial random field, respectively

Back to article page