Table 3 Contrast^a of percent of sit-down restaurants^b and supermarkets^c for each neighborhood type^d pair in 2001

Sit-down restaurant model: estimated beta (95% confidence interval)

 Urban core

–

–

–

–

–

–

 Inner city

− 16.66

(− 18.97, − 14.35)

–

–

–

–

–

 Urban

− 22.04

(− 25.49, − 18.60)

− 5.38

(− 8.05, − 2.71)

–

–

–

–

 Aging suburb

− 24.45

(− 26.35, − 22.55)

− 7.79

(− 9.25, − 6.33)

− 2.41

(− 3.74, − 1.08)

–

–

–

 High-income suburb

− 25.10

(− 26.96, − 23.25)

− 8.44

(− 9.85, − 7.03)

− 3.06

(− 4.66, − 1.46)

− 0.65

(− 1.58, 0.28)

–

–

 Suburban edge

− 28.38

(− 30.00, − 26.75)

− 11.72

(− 12.97, − 10.46)

− 6.33

(− 7.53, − 5.14)

− 3.92

(− 4.65, − 3.20)

− 3.27

(− 4.08, − 2.46)

–

Supermarket model: estimated beta (95% confidence interval)

 Urban core

–

–

–

–

–

–

 Inner city

− 2.02

(− 5.51, 1.48)

–

–

–

–

–

 Urban

− 2.09

(− 5.34, 1.15)

− 0.78

(− 2.58, 2.42)

–

–

–

–

 Aging suburb

− 0.32

(− 3.66, 3.03)

1.70

(− 0.82, 4.22)

1.78

(0.26, 3.29)

–

–

–

 High-income suburb

− 1.91

(− 5.52, 1.70)

0.11

(− 2.66, 2.88)

0.19

(− 1.63, 2.00)

0.25

(− 1.40, 1.91)

–

–

 Suburban edge

− 1.84

(− 5.41, 1.74)

0.18

(− 2.52, 2.88)

0.19

(− 1.63, 2.00)

− 1.59

(− 3.13, − 0.05)

− 1.52

(− 2.84, − 0.21)

–