Skip to main content

Table 4 Contrasta of percent of sit-down restaurantsb and supermarketsc for each neighborhood typed pair in 2011

From: A method for estimating neighborhood characterization in studies of the association with availability of sit-down restaurants and supermarkets

  Urban core Inner city Urban Aging suburb High-income suburb Suburban edge
Sit-down restaurant model: estimated beta (95% confidence interval)
 Urban core
 Inner city − 8.52
(− 11.99, − 5.05)
 Urban − 17.22
(− 23.24, − 11.21)
− 8.70
(− 13.35, − 4.06)
 Aging suburb − 22.16
(− 24.92, − 19.40)
− 13.64
(− 15.73, − 11.55)
− 4.94
(− 7.14, − 2.73)
 High-income suburb − 20.52
(− 23.28, − 17.75)
− 12.00
(− 14.03,− 9.97)
− 3.29
(− 6.02, 0.57)
1.64
(0.31, 2.98)
 Suburban edge − 23.57
(− 26.56, − 20.58)
− 15.05
(− 17.33, − 12.77)
− 6.34
(− 8.50, − 4.19)
− 1.41
(− 2.61, − 0.21)
− 3.05
(− 4.46, − 1.64)
Supermarket model: estimated beta (95% confidence interval)
 Urban core
 Inner city − 2.19
(− 6.76, 2.37)
 Urban − 2.95
(− 7.13, 1.24)
− 0.75
(− 3.98, 2.48)
 Aging suburb − 0.48
(− 4.72, 3.76)
1.71
(− 1.47, 4.90)
2.46
(0.50, 4.43)
 High-income suburb − 3.57
(− 8.04, 0.89)
− 1.38
(− 4.80, 2.04)
− 0.63
(− 2.98, 1.72)
− 3.09
(− 5.14, − 1.05)
-
 Suburban edge − 2.03
(− 6.39, 2.32)
0.16
(− 3.10, 3.42)
0.91
(− 1.16, 2.98)
− 1.55
(− 3.26, 0.15)
1.54
(− 0.38, 3.46)
  1. Refer to the legends in Table 2