Reliability of streetscape audits comparing on‐street and online observations: MAPS-Global in 5 countries

Table 1 Study locations, sample sizes and assessment times for MAPS-Global evaluation

Country	City	Sample size				Assessment time (min/route) Mean ± SD (range)^a
Country	City	Routes	Segments	Crossings	Cul-de-sacs	On-street	Online
Australia	Melbourne	65	208	91	10	19 ± 7 (5–40)	21 ± 7 (9–45)
Belgium	Ghent	81	236	156	6	30 ± 14 (4–85)	26 ± 17 (4–78)
Brazil	Curitiba	82	319	213	0	9 ± 3 (1–23)	11 ± 4 (2–29)
China	Hong Kong SAR	40	115	73	0	17 ± 10 (4–70)	–^b
Spain	Valencia	81	350	266	0	28 ± 9 (10–45)	32 ± 11 (8–62)
Overall		349	1228	799	16	22 ± 12 (1–85)^c	22 ± 12 (2–78)

SD standard deviation
^aThe remarkably different assessment times by country are due to the characteristics of the different regions evaluated
^bStart and end assessment times were not collected in Hong Kong for online assessments
^cThis overall value does not include Hong Kong assessment time due to missing data for the online assessment time comparison

ISSN: 1476-072X