Table 4 Comparison of the OLS, SAR and GWR models for LOS in MCO and SSR facilities

LOS_MCO

 ISA_MCO

− 0.161***

0.037

0.015

0.024

[− 55.959; 8.438]

0.037

 APL_GPs

− 1.065**

0.097

− 0.348***

0.061

[− 37.882; 37.084]

0.097

 APL_Nurses

0.302***

0.096

0.005

0.065

[− 39.567; 78.291]

0.097

 APL_Physiotherapists

− 1.518***

0.165

− 0.953***

0.108

[− 26.147; 33.852]

0.164

 Non− Owner

− 1.395***

0.117

− 0.244***

0.076

[− 4.631; 2.412]

0.116

 Precarious

− 0.507

0.403

− 0.415

0.253

[− 13.835; 10.757]

0.39

Spatial parameters

 Spatial Lag Coefficient ρ

0.767***

 Bandwidth GWR

Adaptive, 0.38% nearest neighbouring IRIS

Model assessment

 Adjusted R²

0.508

0.775

0.955

 AIC

3285.273

2238.6

539.139

 Moran’s I residuals

0.609***

0.031*

0.086***

LOS_SSR

 ISA_SSR

0.245***

0.036

0.131

0.023

[− 7.808; 4.756]

4.241

 APL_GPs

0.332***

0.096

0.034

0.06

[–33.213; 57.124]

0.931

 APL_Nurses

− 1.367***

0.09

− 0.423***

0.063

[− 28.11; 25.561]

1.124

 APL_Physiotherapists

− 1.679***

0.165

− 1.048***

0.108

[− 20.186; 18.678]

0.811

 Non− Owner

− 1.209***

0.114

− 0.169***

0.073

[− 4.631; 2.412]

1.133

 Precarious

− 0.491

0.384

− 0.452

0.241

[− 7.075; 9.112]

0.473

Spatial parameters

 Spatial Lag Coefficient ρ

0.764***

 Bandwidth GWR

Adaptive, 0.52% nearest neighbouring IRIS

Model assessment

0.931

 Adjusted R²

0.485

0.769

939.464

 AIC

3255.05

2181.912

0.131***

 Moran’s I residuals

0.611***

0.032*