Skip to main content

Table 2 Associations between neighborhood characteristics and DV among boys

From: Associations between neighborhood characteristics and dating violence: does spatial scale matter?

 

250 m

500 m

750 m

1000 m

ß (SE)

AIC

ß (SE)

AIC

ß (SE)

AIC

ß (SE)

AIC

Psychological DV perpetration

Risk factors

 Density of off-premises alcohol outlets2

0.15 (0.14)

363.351

0.08 (0.04)*

362.064

0.05 (0.03)

362.621

0.02 (0.02)

363.195

 Density of bars2

− 0.18 (0.17)

363.249

− 0.03 (0.03)

363.620

− 0.02 (0.01)

363.449

− 0.01 (0.01)

363.380

 Crime rate3

− 0.08 (0.13)

362.791

− 0.21 (0.34)

362.638

− 0.56 (0.35)

361.415

− 0.33 (0.39)

362.628

Protective factors

 Walkability1

0.09 (0.08)

362.323

0.10 (0.09)

362.486

0.09 (0.09)

362.629

0.10 (0.09)

362.365

 NDVI2

− 1.92 (2.29)

363.504

− 1.00 (2.37)

364.134

− 0.89 (2.53)

364.187

− 0.45 (2.54)

364.289

 Density of green spaces2

− 0.28 (0.21)

361.705

− 0.07 (0.08)

363.399

− 0.06 (0.05)

362.343

− 0.04 (0.03)

362.239

 Density of community organizations2

0.24 (0.23)

362.165

− 0.02 (0.12)

364.297

− 0.07 (0.08)

363.611

− 0.03 (0.06)

364.085

Physical or sexual DV perpetration

Risk factors

 Density of off-premises alcohol outlets2

0.01 (0.17)

242.997

0.04 (0.06)

242.771

0.00 (0.03)

243.000

0.01 (0.03)

242.950

 Density of bars2

− 0.32 (0.26)

241.920

− 0.03 (0.06)

242.897

− 0.03 (0.02)†

242.115

− 0.02 (0.01)

242.270

 Crime rate3

0.14 (0.16)

245.851

0.97 (0.28)***

237.656

0.84 (0.37)*

241.587

0.08 (0.56)

246.688

Protective factors

 Walkability1

0.04 (0.12)

241.001

− 0.02 (0.11)

241.101

0.02 (0.11)

241.090

− 0.01 (0.12)

241.117

 NDVI2

0.86 (3.30)

242.908

2.54 (3.95)

242.334

2.43 (4.11)

242.470

1.77 (3.86)

242.728

 Density of green spaces2

0.10 (0.17)

242.730

− 0.04 (0.06)

242.811

− 0.03 (0.05)

242.744

− 0.03 (0.04)

242.436

 Density of community organizations2

0.04 (0.36)

242.984

− 0.15 (0.18)

242.313

− 0.11 (0.16)

242.264

− 0.05 (0.11)

242.714

Psychological DV victimization

Risk factors

 Density of off-premises alcohol outlets2

0.17 (0.13)

460.258

0.06 (0.05)

460.447

0.01 (0.03)

461.867

0.00 (0.02)

462.022

 Density of bars2

0.01 (0.11)

462.040

− 0.03 (0.03)

461.575

− 0.01 (0.01)

461.414

− 0.01 (0.01)

461.505

 Crime rate3

0.00 (0.11)

461.795

− 0.01 (0.03)

461.770

− 0.13 (0.35)

461.644

− 0.17 (0.42)

461.612

Protective factors

 Walkability1

− 0.05 (0.08)

461.103

− 0.10 (0.09)

460.043

− 0.08 (0.10)

460.752

− 0.01 (0.09)

461.562

 NDVI2

− 2.75 (1.99)

459.792

− 2.88 (2.13)

460.042

− 3.59 (2.13)†

459.257

− 4.24 (2.09)*

458.285

 Density of green spaces2

− 0.22 (0.16)

459.432

− 0.01 (0.05)

462.005

0.00 (0.03)

462.042

− 0.01 (0.03)

461.718

 Density of community organizations2

0.25 (0.22)

460.124

0.01 (0.11)

462.023

− 0.01 (0.08)

462.007

− 0.02 (0.06)

461.913

Physical or sexual DV victimization

Risk factors

 Density of off-premises alcohol outlets2

0.06 (0.13)

403.780

− 0.01 (0.05)

403.894

− 0.03 (0.03)

403.315

0.00 (0.02)

403.891

 Density of bars2

− 0.13 (0.19)

403.313

− 0.02 (0.03)

403.620

− 0.01 (0.02)

403.560

− 0.01 (0.01)

403.618

 Crime rate3

0.18 (0.09)*

404.269

− 0.02 (0.02)

407.190

0.03 (0.24)

407.190

− 0.13 (0.37)

407.089

Protective factors

 Walkability1

− 0.04 (0.08)

401.915

− 0.02 (0.09)

402.165

0.02 (0.10)

402.145

− 0.03 (0.10)

402.123

 NDVI2

0.35 (1.98)

403.883

0.68 (2.13)

403.817

1.35 (2.15)

403.571

0.57 (2.12)

403.855

 Density of green spaces2

− 0.04 (0.15)

403.830

0.01 (0.07)

403.904

0.04 (0.04)

402.625

0.02 (0.03)

403.306

 Density of community organizations2

0.07 (0.21)

403.813

− 0.18 (0.13)

401.684

− 0.02 (0.08)

403.879

0.01 (0.06)

403.898

  1. 1Models were adjusted for individual-level covariates and sociodemographic characteristics at the neighborhood-level. The scale used for each neighborhood-level covariates varies by outcomes (lowest AIC)
  2. 2Models were adjusted for individual-level covariates and sociodemographic characteristics and walkability at the neighborhood-level. The scale used for each neighborhood-level covariates varies by outcomes (lowest AIC)
  3. 3Models were adjusted for individual-level covariates, and sociodemographic characteristics, walkability, density of green spaces, density of off-premises alcohol outlets and density of bars at the neighborhood-level. The scale used for each neighborhood-level covariates varies by outcomes (lowest AIC)
  4. ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05; †p < 0.10