Skip to main content

Table 3 Associations between neighborhood characteristics and DV among girls

From: Associations between neighborhood characteristics and dating violence: does spatial scale matter?

 

250 m

500 m

750 m

1000 m

ß (SE)

AIC

ß (SE)

AIC

ß (SE)

AIC

ß (SE)

AIC

Psychological DV perpetration

Risk factors

 Density of off-premises alcohol outlets2

0.03 (0.15)

494.899

− 0.01 (0.06)

494.933

− 0.01 (0.03)

494.892

− 0.01 (0.02)

494.419

 Density of bars2

− 0.13 (0.14)

494.127

− 0.02 (0.05)

494.763

− 0.02 (0.02)

494.128

− 0.01 (0.01)

494.645

 Crime rate3

− 0.13 (0.13)

497.286

− 0.34 (0.25)

496.838

− 0.73 (0.40)†

495.455

− 0.71 (0.48)

495.676

Protective factors

 Walkability1

− 0.10 (0.07)

496.008

− 0.19 (0.07)**

492.949

− 0.20 (0.07)**

494.037

− 0.19 (0.07)*

494.413

 NDVI2

0.02 (1.56)

494.949

− 0.67 (1.75)

494.820

− 0.29 (1.90)

494.926

− 0.09 (1.95)

494.946

 Density of green spaces2

0.18 (0.14)

493.110

− 0.02 (0.05)

494.860

0.01 (0.03)

494.827

0.01 (0.02)

494.507

 Density of community organizations2

0.12 (0.22)

494.482

− 0.14 (0.16)

493.350

− 0.05('− 0.09)

494.567

− 0.04 (0.06)

494.276

Physical or sexual DV perpetration

Risk factors

 Density of off-premises alcohol outlets2

0.16 (0.14)

457.140

0.00 (0.07)

458.632

0.04 (0.03)

457.265

0.01 (0.02)

458.404

 Density of bars2

− 0.09 (0.15)

458.269

0.05 (0.06)

457.821

0.00 (0.02)

458.592

− 0.01 (0.01)

458.261

 Crime rate3

− 0.00 (0.05)

460.683

− 0.20 (0.25)

459.964

− 0.66 (0.41)

456.010

− 0.61 (0.44)

458.209

Protective factors

 Walkability1

− 0.00 (0.07)

456.774

− 0.05 (0.07)

456.281

− 0.06 (0.07)

456.028

− 0.05 (0.07)

456.243

 NDVI2

1.47 (1.66)

457.857

3.09 (1.91)

456.057

3.52 (1.99)†

455.581

3.42 (1.93)†

455.795

 Density of green spaces2

0.03 (0.13)

458.585

0.06 (0.06)

457.536

0.03 (0.03)

457.622

0.02 (0.02)

457.867

 Density of community organizations2

0.02 (0.21)

458.629

− 0.09 (0.13)

458.027

− 0.08 (0.08)

457.717

− 0.05 (0.06)

457.903

Psychological DV victimization

Risk factors

 Density of off-premises alcohol outlets2

0.04 (0.12)

582.214

0.01 (0.05)

582.304

− 0.02 (0.03)

581.712

− 0.02 (0.02)

580.185

 Density of bars2

− 0.29 (0.15)*

578.118

− 0.08 (0.06)

580.316

− 0.04 (0.02)†

579.715

− 0.03 (0.01)*

578.322

 Crime rate3

− 0.08 (0.10)

584.017

− 0.14 (0.16)

584.536

− 0.11 (0.32)

585.194

− 0.28 (0.37)

584.684

Protective factors

 Walkability1

− 0.06 (0.06)

585.322

− 0.13 (0.06)*

582.121

− 0.17 (0.06)**

580.321

− 0.17 (0.07)*

580.406

 NDVI2

− 0.01 (1.41)

582.321

− 0.3 (1.64)

582.287

0.36 (1.82)

582.276

0.41 (1.86)

582.265

 Density of green spaces2

− 0.01 (0.13)

582.312

− 0.04 (0.05)

581.598

− 0.02 (0.03)

581.934

− 0.01 (0.02)

581.934

 Density of community organizations2

0.06 (0.20)

582.208

− 0.07 (0.11)

581.842

− 0.01 (0.07)

582.315

− 0.04 (0.05)

581.745

Physical or sexual DV victimization

Risk factors

 Density of off-premises alcohol outlets2

0.06 (0.12)

487.397

− 0.04 (0.06)

487.201

− 0.01 (0.03)

487.537

− 0.01 (0.02)

487.503

 Density of bars2

− 0.10 (0.18)

487.300

− 0.02 (0.08)

487.494

− 0.01 (0.02)

487.482

− 0.01 (0.01)

487.317

 Crime rate3

− 0.01 (0.04)

488.524

− 0.04 (0.15)

488.502

− 0.05 (0.46)

488.552

0.23 (0.50)

488.303

Protective factors

 Walkability1

− 0.15 (0.07)*

485.604

− 0.15 (0.07)*

486.837

− 0.13 (0.07)†

488.062

− 0.08 (0.07)

490.049

 NDVI2

2.69 (1.56)†

484.771

3.30 (1.79)†

484.218

3.86 (1.81)*

483.195

4.25 (1.82)*

482.368

 Density of green spaces2

0.02 (0.12)

487.574

0.06 (0.05)

486.369

0.03 (0.03)

486.950

0.03 (0.02)

485.826

 Density of community organizations2

0.42 (0.20)*

482.699

0.13 (0.11)

486.268

0.06 (0.07)

486.763

0.02 (0.05)

487.454

  1. 1Models were adjusted for individual-level covariates and sociodemographic characteristics at the neighborhood-level. The scale used for each neighborhood-level covariates varies by outcomes (lowest AIC)
  2. 2Models were adjusted for individual-level covariates and sociodemographic characteristics and walkability at the neighborhood-level. The scale used for each neighborhood-level covariates varies by outcomes (lowest AIC)
  3. 3Models were adjusted for individual-level covariates, and sociodemographic characteristics, walkability, density of green spaces, density of off-premises alcohol outlets and density of bars at the neighborhood-level. The scale used for each neighborhood-level covariates varies by outcomes (lowest AIC)
  4. ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05; †p < 0.10