Skip to main content

Table 1 Description of study variables and their spatial autocorrelation stratified by urban–rural context and overall census blocks

From: Role of mammography accessibility, deprivation and spatial effect in breast cancer screening participation in France: an observational ecological study

Variables

Overall (n = 496)

Urban

Peri-urban

Rural

p-value

 

Mean (SD)

Moran’s I

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

 

 Screening participation (%)

48.3 (9.90)

0.29 (< 0.001)

46.6 (7.54)

47.9 (6.57)

53.1 (6.16)

 < 0.001

Spatial accessibility

      

 Travel distance to the closest mammography (in km)

1.53 (1.15)

0.57 (< 0.001)

0.98 (0.67)

1.29 (0.75)

2.30 (1.42)

 < 0.001

 Density of GPsa

1.12 (1.27)

0.06 (0.01)

1.15 (1.64)

0.73 (0.84)

0.49 (0.77)

 < 0.001

Traveling

      

 Traveling by car (%)

53.4 (20.5)

0.74 (< 0.001)

33.7 (10.1)

56.0 (10.0)

73.2 (8.84)

 < 0.001

 With no transportation access (%)

3.08 (2.19)

0.49 (0.03)

3.40 (1.73)

3.08 (1.48)

3.71 (3.59)

0.13

Social cohesion

      

 Living alone in a household (%)

10.6 (3.95)

0.48 (< 0.001)

27.7 (9.27)

18.0 (5.45)

12.0 (5.20)

 < 0.001

 Married (%)

41.9 (13.3)

0.54 (< 0.001)

31.1 (10.2)

42.2 (5.68)

51.3 (8.52)

 < 0.001

Socioeconomic deprivation

 

0.49 (< 0.001)

   

 < 0.001

 High deprivation [n (%)]

168 (33.9)

 

36 (21.81)

92 (56.79)

40 (23.81)

 

 Medium deprivation [n (%)]

164 (33.1)

 

63 (38.19)

40 (24.69)

60 (35.71)

 

 Low deprivation [n (%)]

163 (32.9)

 

66 (40.00)

30 (18.52)

68 (40.48)

 
  1. CB census blocks, GP general practitioners, SD standard deviation
  2. aPer 100 women invited to screen