Table 2 Models to estimate mammography participation according to the geographic accessibility of services adjusted on covariates

Travel distance continuous (in km)

− 0.49 (− 1.00, 0.01)†

− 0.51 (− 1.01, 0.00)*

− 0.42 (− 0.94, 0.10)

Density of GPs

− 0.12 (− 0.56, 0.32)

− 0.11 (− 0.54, 0.31)

− 0.13 (− 0.55, 0.30)

Degree of urbanization

 Rural

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

 Urban

− 4.58 (− 6.08, − 3.08)**

− 1.42 (− 3.94, 1.10)

− 1.32 (− 3.84, 1.20)

 Peri-urban

− 1.66 (− 3.11, − 0.21)*

− 0.31 (− 2.01, 1.39)

− 0.42 (− 2.12, 1.29)

Deprivation level

− 2.81 (− 3.39, − 2.24)**

− 3.19 (− 3.79, − 2.60)**

− 2.98 (− 3.86, − 2.07)**

Interaction terms

 Rural and deprivation

Ref.

 Urban and deprivation

− 1.62 (− 3.18, − 0.07)*^a

 Peri-urban and deprivation

− 0.64 (− 2.09, 0.81)

Modes of travel

 % of the population traveling by car

0.13 (0.07, 0.19)**

0.13 (0.07, 0.19)**

 % of the population with no transportation access

− 0.24 (− 0.45, − 0.03)*

− 0.24 (− 0.45, − 0.03)*

Social cohesion

 % of the married population

− 0.11 (− 0.19, − 0.05)**

− 0.10 (− 0.17, − 0.02)*

 % of the population living alone in a household

− 0.05 (− 0.14, 0.04)

− 0.04 (− 0.13, 0.05)

Moran’s I

− 0.04

− 0.04

− 0.04

 R²

0.40

0.44

0.44

 AIC

3134

3103

3102

Spatial lag coefficients

 Participation lag (ρ)

0.46 (0.34, 0.59)**

0.38 (0.24, 0.51)**

0.41 (0.27, 0.54)**