- Methodology
- Open Access
Using ArcMap, Google Earth, and Global Positioning Systems to select and locate random households in rural Haiti
- Peter J Wampler1Email author,
- Richard R Rediske2 and
- Azizur R Molla3
https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-12-3
© Wampler et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
- Received: 9 November 2012
- Accepted: 6 January 2013
- Published: 18 January 2013
Abstract
Background
A remote sensing technique was developed which combines a Geographic Information System (GIS); Google Earth, and Microsoft Excel to identify home locations for a random sample of households in rural Haiti. The method was used to select homes for ethnographic and water quality research in a region of rural Haiti located within 9 km of a local hospital and source of health education in Deschapelles, Haiti. The technique does not require access to governmental records or ground based surveys to collect household location data and can be performed in a rapid, cost-effective manner.
Methods
The random selection of households and the location of these households during field surveys were accomplished using GIS, Google Earth, Microsoft Excel, and handheld Garmin GPSmap 76CSx GPS units. Homes were identified and mapped in Google Earth, exported to ArcMap 10.0, and a random list of homes was generated using Microsoft Excel which was then loaded onto handheld GPS units for field location. The development and use of a remote sensing method was essential to the selection and location of random households.
Results
A total of 537 homes initially were mapped and a randomized subset of 96 was identified as potential survey locations. Over 96% of the homes mapped using Google Earth imagery were correctly identified as occupied dwellings. Only 3.6% of the occupants of mapped homes visited declined to be interviewed. 16.4% of the homes visited were not occupied at the time of the visit due to work away from the home or market days. A total of 55 households were located using this method during the 10 days of fieldwork in May and June of 2012.
Conclusions
The method used to generate and field locate random homes for surveys and water sampling was an effective means of selecting random households in a rural environment lacking geolocation infrastructure. The success rate for locating households using a handheld GPS was excellent and only rarely was local knowledge required to identify and locate households. This method provides an important technique that can be applied to other developing countries where a randomized study design is needed but infrastructure is lacking to implement more traditional participant selection methods.
Keywords
- Bacterial water testing
- Google Earth
- Ethnographic study
- Anthropology
- GPS
Background
Use of a geographic information system (GIS), a system for input, storage, manipulation, and output of geographic information provides a powerful tool for public health assessment and monitoring in remote locations and developing countries [1]. GIS-based approaches have been used to study infectious diseases like malaria in Africa [2] and dengue virus in different parts of the world [3, 4]. Effective use of GIS in public health assessment typically requires basic infrastructure data layers for georeferencing data (addresses, zip codes, streets, city blocks, location of health facilities, etc.). In rural Haiti, geospatial infrastructure often is lacking, making it difficult to implement GIS-based household water quality sampling, ethnographic surveys, and randomized study designs. Although satellite imagery and aerial photos have been available for many years, their use was limited due to cost and availability, particularly for public health officials in developing countries [5, 6]. The advent of internet based mapping technologies such as Google EarthTM and Google MapsTM provide free satellite imagery, aerial photos, and topographic data for most of Earth's land surface, resulting in increased availability of mapping technology for use by public health workers and researchers [7–9]. However, Google EarthTM still lacks the robust map manipulation and analysis functions of GIS software [9], and often requires data export/import to a GIS program such as ESRI’s ArcMAP 10.0 (ESRI, Redlands, CA) for further analysis and map preparation. Recently, public health assessment programs have effectively combined GIS and Google EarthTM to collect data for dengue fever [10], schistosomiasis [11], and mortality [12]. This article describes a method that utilizes GIS; Google EarthTM (Google Inc., Mountain View, CA), and Microsoft Microsoft ExcelTM 2010 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA) to map and select random households for ethnographic surveys and water sampling in rural Haiti. The technique is applicable to other developing countries, does not require access to address records or ground-based surveys to collect household location data, can be prepared prior to field work with common software packages, and requires only a handheld GPS to accomplish accurate field location of selected households.
Random sampling for ethnographic and public health surveys provides a representative sample of target populations, and ultimately representative data from these populations can be collected [13]. In cases where the sample population is inherently stratified or grouped, stratified random sampling can be employed [14]. For example, populations can be stratified by age, gender, or geographic location. Random samples, subjects, or households, are then selected from each strata or group. Stratification for this study was geographically-based. Clusters or groups of homes were located within circular polygon regions (strata) variable distances (1–9 km) from Hôpital Albert Schweitzer (HAS) [15], a local source of health care and community development support. Homes were randomly selected from each cluster for ethnographic surveys and water sampling.
Study area
Study area location map.
Results and discussion
Home clusters and summary data for field data collection from 55 homes
Distance to HAS | Geographic name | Homes in Cluster | Homes sampled | % sampled | Homes misidentified | Homes declined | Not home |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | LaForge | 69 | 5 | 7% | 0 | 1 | 0 |
2 | Haute LaForge/Ange | 44 | 7 | 16% | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3 | Ange | 44 | 7 | 16% | 0 | 0 | 2 |
4 | Champion/Vielot | 71 | 7 | 10% | 2 | 1 | 0 |
5 | Savonet | 63 | 7 | 11% | 0 | 0 | 2 |
6 | Salo | 40 | 6 | 15% | 0 | 0 | 1 |
7 | Salas | 48 | 6 | 13% | 0 | 0 | 2 |
8 | Trankite | 38 | 6 | 16% | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9 | Dauphine | 53 | 4 | 8% | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Factors that contributed to unsuccessful home identification, home location, and occupancy at the time of our visit included: 1) lack of homeowner availability on market days and holidays; 2) house construction methods in Haiti; and 3) road and trail access. Market days in much of Haiti take place two days a week in a given village and often occur on different days in other villages within walking distance. This results in an exodus of residents from their homes in certain rural villages on market days. Since some of these villages are remote and difficult to access, it is prudent to coordinate visitation of these locations to avoid market days and holidays. It is common practice in Haiti for homes to be “under construction” for years to decades. This may result in a roof being put in place for many years prior to occupancy of a dwelling. Aerial mapping of homes was unable to distinguish between roofs of homes under construction and occupied dwellings, resulting in at least two cases in the mapping of homes which were not occupied. In some cases, dwellings that appeared to be close together were in reality difficult to access due to a lack of roads or trails which were not evident from aerial mapping.
Due to the variable nature of the size and configuration of houses, schools, and churches in Haiti, it was not feasible to distinguish them from individual homes using aerial imagery. Consequently it was important to identify a larger number of homes from which the random sample could be selected. Our drivers, interpreter, and local residents were able to provide valuable local knowledge in these cases to locate expedient access routes and facilitate sampling in a timely fashion.
Conclusions
The method used to generate and field locate random homes for surveys and water sampling was an effective means of selecting random households in a rural environment lacking geolocation infrastructure. The success rate for locating households using a handheld GPS was excellent and only occasionally was local knowledge required to identify and locate households. The use of this method avoided the potential bias which could be introduced if an interpreter or driver were used to locate homes for survey or sampling. This method was fast, relatively straightforward and required only limited access to GIS and computer technology to setup the field survey. Once the lists and GPS coordinates were generated and loaded to field units, no internet or cell phone data access was needed to accomplish the survey. This method provides an important technique that can be applied to other developing countries where a randomized study design is needed but the necessary geolocation infrastructure is lacking to implement a more traditional randomized study design.
Methods
Home clusters were chosen based on distance from HAS. One of the goals of the ethnographic survey was to evaluate how proximity to this important source of health care, community development services, and water quality interventions influenced water quality perceptions and practices. Cluster selection was restricted to two geographic areas, similar in size to counties in the United States, called Belanger and Bastien. Cluster locations were all within 9 kilometers of HAS and were chosen based on 1) household density; 2) road access; and 3) field data collection feasibility. Clusters had to be located so that water quality bacterial analysis could be completed within the required holding time of 6 hours to maintain E. coli viability [17]. Occasionally sites were revisited on the way to or from another location. This was made possible by having the sites located in the same direction from the hospital.
We received Grand Valley State University Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval for the water sampling and ethnographic surveys (IRB# 10-256-H) associated with this study. The random selection of households and the location of these households during field surveys were accomplished using GIS, Google EarthTM, Microsoft ExcelTM, and handheld Garmin GPSmap 76CSx GPS units. Since there were little or no written documents available from the Haitian government, with respect to census data and residential addresses, the development of a remote selection method was essential to the success of the study. The method could be successfully applied in other developing countries where geographic infrastructure is lacking.
ArcMAP buffers and household mapping
One kilometer circular buffer regions centered on the Hôpital Albert Schweitzer (HAS). Basemap layer is a Landsat Enhanced Thematic Mapper true color image (bands 1,2,3).
Example of a Google Earth aerial photo onto which homes were mapped (white dots). Green Boxes are the homes randomly selected using Microsoft Excel and the red boxes are households actually visited during the survey.
The point layer of homes created in Google Earth was imported into ArcMap and attributes were added for latitude and longitude (WGS 84 coordinate system). These geographic coordinates were later uploaded into a handheld GPS and used to locate homes in the field for conducting field surveys.
Random household selection and field location
Household spreadsheet for area 1 (one kilometer from HAS)
OBJECTID | GVSU_ID | Sample_Order | Random_no | Longitude | Latitude |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | H-1-31 | 1 | 0.01149229844 | -72.498970817 | 19.076093979 |
2 | H-1-34 | 2 | 0.01827961793 | -72.499270420 | 19.076230928 |
3 | H-1-18 | 3 | 0.05403995752 | -72.499427800 | 19.074163608 |
4 | H-1-25 | 4 | 0.05975003586 | -72.497521680 | 19.075499980 |
5 | H-1-43 | 5 | 0.08377157472 | -72.496706672 | 19.076214581 |
6 | H-1-32 | 6 | 0.08571745333 | -72.498367128 | 19.075961350 |
7 | H-1-37 | 7 | 0.08664302715 | -72.499569703 | 19.075585606 |
8 | H-1-56 | 8 | 0.12194280027 | -72.498046910 | 19.076895770 |
9 | H-1-39 | 9 | 0.14165299621 | -72.499963138 | 19.075850242 |
10 | H-1-52 | 10 | 0.19335796388 | -72.498023657 | 19.076108015 |
11 | H-1-33 | 11 | 0.19348332138 | -72.499451467 | 19.076067500 |
12 | H-1-17 | 12 | 0.19705891490 | -72.499290284 | 19.074004758 |
13 | H-1-6 | 13 | 0.19907687246 | -72.498054155 | 19.074578809 |
14 | H-1-46 | 14 | 0.21060435716 | -72.496620005 | 19.076746775 |
15 | H-1-7 | 15 | 0.25007727144 | -72.497646039 | 19.073284607 |
16 | H-1-44 | 16 | 0.26452753465 | -72.497272413 | 19.076373471 |
17 | H-1-45 | 17 | 0.27173287408 | -72.497747780 | 19.076187511 |
18 | H-1-13 | 18 | 0.27507139853 | -72.497780219 | 19.074519407 |
19 | H-1-26 | 19 | 0.28955065050 | -72.497639192 | 19.075524139 |
20 | H-1-62 | 20 | 0.29334220958 | -72.496385904 | 19.077126559 |
21 | H-1-5 | 21 | 0.29419897483 | -72.497958235 | 19.074562629 |
22 | H-1-66 | 22 | 0.29790014023 | -72.495913123 | 19.076722700 |
Declarations
Acknowledgements
This work was funded in part by the Grand Valley State University’s Center for Scholarly Research and Excellence, College of Liberal Arts and Science, Annis Water Resources Institute, and Padnos International Center. Field assistance was given by our very capable and helpful Haitian drivers and our interpreter, Rony Saint Armand. Logistical help and assistance were provided by Dawn Johnson and Renold Estimé of the HAS community development office.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
- Lozano-Fuentes S, Elizondo-Quiroga D, Farfan-Ale JA, Loroño-Pino MA, Garcia-Rejon J, Gomez-Carro S, Lira-Zumbardo V, Najera-Vazquez R, Fernandez-Salas I, Calderon-Martinez J: Use of Google EarthTM to strengthen public health capacity and facilitate management of vector-borne diseases in resource-poor environments. Bull World Health Organ. 2008, 86: 718-725. 10.2471/BLT.07.045880.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kleinschmidt I, Omumbo J, Briet O, van de Giesen N, Sogoba N, Mensah NK, Windmeijer P, Moussa M, Teuscher T: An empirical malaria distribution map for West Africa Volume 6. 2001, England: Trop Med Int Health, 779-786.Google Scholar
- Carbajo AE, Schweigmann N, Curto SI, de Garin A, Bejaran R: Dengue transmission risk maps of Argentina Volume 6. 2001, England: Trop Med Int Health, 170-183.Google Scholar
- Rotela C, Fouque F, Lamfri M, Sabatier P, Introini V, Zaidenberg M, Scavuzzo C: Space-time analysis of the dengue spreading dynamics in the 2004 Tartagal outbreak, Northern Argentina Volume 103. 2007, Netherlands: Acta Trop, 1-13.Google Scholar
- Herbreteau V, Salem G, Souris M, Hugot JP, Gonzalez JP: Thirty years of use and improvement of remote sensing, applied to epidemiology: from early promises to lasting frustration Volume 13. 2007, England: Health Place, 400-403.Google Scholar
- Mills JW, Curtis A: Geospatial approaches for disease risk communication in marginalized communities Volume 2. 2008, United States: Prog Community Health Partnersh, 61-72.Google Scholar
- Boulos MN: Web GIS in practice III: creating a simple interactive map of England's Strategic Health Authorities using Google Maps API, Google Earth KML, and MSN Virtual Earth Map Control. Volume 4. 2005, England: Int J Health Geogr, 22-Google Scholar
- Kamadjeu R: Tracking the polio virus down the Congo River: a case study on the use of Google Earth in public health planning and mapping Volume 8. 2009, England: Int J Health Geogr, 4-Google Scholar
- FERNANDEZ I: Use of Google earth to facilitate GIS based decision support systems for arthropod-borne diseases. Advances in disease surveillance. 2007, 4: 91-91.Google Scholar
- Chang AY, Parrales ME, Jimenez J, Sobieszczyk ME, Hammer SM, Copenhaver DJ, Kulkarni RP: Combining Google Earth and GIS mapping technologies in a dengue surveillance system for developing countries Volume 8. 2009, England: Int J Health Geogr, 49-Google Scholar
- Kun Y, Le-Ping S, Yi-Xin H, Guo-Jing Y, Feng W, De-Rong H, Wei L, Jian-Feng Z, Yong-Sheng L, Xiao-Nong Z: A real-time platform for monitoring schistosomiasis transmission supported by Google Earth and a web-based geographical information system. Geospat Health. 2012, 6: 195-203.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Galway LP, Bell N, Al Shatari SAE, Hagopian A, Burnham G, Flaxman A, Weiss WM, Rajaratnam J, Takaro TK: A two-stage cluster sampling method using gridded population data, a GIS, and Google Earth TM imagery in a population-based mortality survey in Iraq. Int J Health Geogr. 2012, 11: 12-10.1186/1476-072X-11-12.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Babbie E: Social Research Counts. 2012, Belmont, CA, USA: Wadsworth Cengage LearningGoogle Scholar
- Mann PS: Introductory Statistics. 2007, New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons IncGoogle Scholar
- Hôpital Albert Schweitzer Official Web Site: Hôpital Albert Schweitzer - saving lives, changing lives for more than 50 years. http://www.hashaiti.org/,
- Bertuzzo E, Mari L, Righetto L, Gatto M, Casagrandi R, Blokesch M, Rodriguez-Iturbe I, Rinaldo A: Prediction of the spatial evolution and effects of control measures for the unfolding Haiti cholera outbreak. Geophys Res Lett. 2011, 38: L06403-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Association APH: Water Environment Federation (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 1994, DC: WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Earth Explorer. http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/,
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.