- Open Access
Analysis of simultaneous space-time clusters of Campylobacter spp. in humans and in broiler flocks using a multiple dataset approach
© Jonsson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
- Received: 10 June 2010
- Accepted: 22 September 2010
- Published: 22 September 2010
Campylobacteriosis is the most frequently reported zoonosis in the EU and the epidemiology of sporadic campylobacteriosis, especially the routes of transmission, is to a great extent unclear. Poultry easily become colonised with Campylobacter spp., being symptom-less intestinal carriers. Earlier it was estimated that internationally between 50% and 80% of the cases could be attributed to chicken as a reservoir. In a Norwegian surveillance programme all broiler flocks under 50 days of age were tested for Campylobacter spp. The aim of the current study was to identify simultaneous local space-time clusters each year from 2002 to 2007 for human cases of campylobacteriosis and for broiler flocks testing positive for Campylobacter spp. using a multivariate spatial scan statistic method. A cluster occurring simultaneously in humans and broilers could indicate the presence of common factors associated with the dissemination of Campylobacter spp. for both humans and broilers.
Local space-time clusters of humans and broilers positive for Campylobacter spp. occurring simultaneously were identified in all investigated years. All clusters but one were identified from May to August. Some municipalities were included in clusters all years.
The simultaneous occurrence of clusters of humans and broilers positive for Campylobacter spp. combined with the knowledge that poultry meat has a nation-wide distribution indicates that campylobacteriosis cases might also be caused by other risk factors than consumption and handling of poultry meat.
Broiler farms that are positive could contaminate the environment with further spread to new broiler farms or to humans living in the area and local environmental factors, such as climate, might influence the spread of Campylobacter spp. in an area. Further studies to clarify the role of such factors are needed.
- Human Case
- Poultry Meat
- Broiler Meat
- Broiler Flock
Campylobacteriosis is the most frequently reported zoonosis in the EU . Between 2002 and 2008 the incidence for domestically acquired campylobacteriosis in Norway varied between 19.1 (2002) and 26.2 (2005) reported cases per 100 000 inhabitants . Outbreaks of campylobacteriosis are relatively rare; most infections seem to be sporadic . However, the epidemiology of sporadic campylobacteriosis, especially the routes of transmission, is to a great extent unclear [4, 5]. Internationally it is estimated that handling, preparation and consumption of broiler meat may account for 20% to 30% of the human cases . However, it has been suggested that chicken as a reservoir might account for between 50% and 80% of the cases . The latter estimates are based on studies of sequence typing of Campylobacter and the assumption that strains from chicken may reach humans by other pathways than food, e.g. through the environment or by direct contact. Poultry easily become colonised with Campylobacter spp. being symptomless intestinal carriers of the organism. Once some broilers in a flock become colonised, the bacteria spread rapidly to most of the birds in the flock [7, 8]. Several epidemiological studies have identified management and environmental risk factors for the occurrence of Campylobacter spp. in broiler flocks, e.g. low level of bio-security, number of broiler houses on a farm, drinking water quality, season and the presence of other farm animals in the vicinity [9–16]. Norway implemented an Action Plan against Campylobacter spp. in broilers in 2001, hereafter called the Action Plan, consisting of three parts: a surveillance programme including all commercial Norwegian broiler flocks slaughtered before 50 days of age (virtually all broiler flocks), a follow-up advisory service for farms delivering positive flocks and surveys of broiler meat products at the retail level . In the surveillance programme during the period 2001-2007, each flock was tested for Campylobacter spp. in caecal droppings 4-8 days before slaughter and again at slaughter at the abattoir as described elsewhere [15, 18]. In this period the annual incidence of Norwegian broiler flocks that tested positive for Campylobacter spp. varied between 3.3% (2004) and 6.3% (2002) with considerable differences between seasons and regions.
The aims of the current study was to identify simultaneous local space-time clusters each year from 2002 to 2007 for human cases of campylobacteriosis and for broiler flocks testing positive for Campylobacter spp. using a multivariate spatial scan statistic method and to obtain the relative risk of being a case within a such cluster. Identification of clusters could indicate a possible presence of common factors associated with the dissemination of Campylobacter spp. for both humans and broilers.
Study period and study area
Multivariate SaTScan™ analyses of Campylobacter spp. in humans and broilers, 2002-2007 in Norway
Proportion cases in cluster (%)
Observed cases (expected cases)
No. muni.#in cluster
3 July - 30 July
12 June - 9 July
10 July - 30 July
19 June - 16 July
10 July - 6 Aug.
3 July - 30 July
26 June - 16 July
24 July - 20 Aug.
26 June - 23 July
17 July - 13 Aug.
31 July - 27 Aug.
17 July - 13 Aug.
17 July - 13 Aug.
17 July - 13 Aug.
21 Aug. - 10 Sep.
26 June - 23 July
29 May - 25 June
19 June - 16 July
17 July - 6 Aug.
19 June - 16 July
24 July - 6 Aug.
10 July - 6 Aug.
The target population was commercial broiler flocks in Norway. Broiler flock was the study unit and data on broiler flocks with corresponding Campylobacter spp. results was generated from the Action Plan. The geographical location for each farm defined on the municipality level was obtained from the Agricultural Property Registry (the official census database for information on agricultural properties in Norway). In the Action Plan there were 709 farms that delivered 22 281 broiler flocks during the study period. Farms which had delivered only one or two flocks for slaughter in only one of the years (n = 63) and farms where geographical coordinates were missing (n = 23) were excluded. In addition, to avoid inclusion of a flock more than once, only the first flock result per farm in a seven-day period was included (2559 flocks excluded). This resulted in a study population of 19 484 broiler flocks originating from 623 different farms.
There were between 1.57 (2007) and 1.63 (2002) million inhabitants in the study area each year during the study period. The human population figures were obtained from Statistics Norway. The human population density per municipality each year was calculated using the human population figures as the numerator and area data of the municipalities as the denominator (Figure 1).
A broiler case was defined as a broiler flock where at least one of the test results was positive for Campylobacter spp. The date of slaughter of a positive broiler flock was defined as the time of the occurrence of a case. In total, 886 broiler cases were included. The number of broiler cases each year is shown in Table 1. Data on confirmed domestic cases of human campylobacteriosis (n = 2348) within the study area during the study period was obtained from the Norwegian Surveillance System for Communicable Diseases (MSIS, Norwegian Institute for Public Health) (Table 1). A case was defined as a person with laboratory-confirmed Campylobacter spp. in faeces. The reported day of sampling was used as the time of occurrence of a case. The municipality in which the infection was supposed to have occurred was used as the geographical location of a case. The information of the geographical location was not available for 27% of the cases, and for those the municipality of residence was used as the geographical location.
Statistical and space-time analyses
Statistical data handling and analyses were performed using SAS Enterprise Guide version 4 for Windows (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and STATA version 10 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA).
Space-time cluster analysis was performed each given year for both human and broiler cases in the study area using the space-time scan statistic SaTScan™ v.8.2.1 software (Kulldorff M. and Information Management Services, Inc. SaTScan™ v8.2.1 http://www.satscan.org/) . The method is based on cylinders, or scanning windows, centred on each geographical location, with the base representing space and the height representing time. The alternative hypothesis assumes that there is an elevated risk within the window compared to outside. The window with the maximum likelihood constitutes the most likely cluster and this is the cluster least likely to have occurred by chance. In addition, secondary clusters are identified, that are ordered according to their likelihood ratio test statistic. P-values are obtained through Monte Carlo hypothesis testing. Significant clusters (p < 0.05) and relative risks, comparing the risk of being a case inside the window with the risk of being a case outside, are calculated.
The analysis was performed using the Poisson model, which requires case and population counts for each geographical unit as well as the geographical coordinates. To identify clusters with high power occurring simultaneously in humans and broilers, the multivariate scan statistic analysis approach was used where adjustment for the different informational content when combining different datasets is automatically performed as described by Kulldorff et al. . In this method the log likelihood ratios are calculated for each of the included datasets and are then summed up. The sum constitutes the likelihood for a particular window. The window with the maximum sum of likelihood ratio is the most likely cluster. It was assumed under the null-hypothesis that the number of human cases and broiler cases are proportional to the population of humans and broilers respectively in each municipality. Each year of the study period was analysed separately. The size of the scanning window was allowed to increase to a maximum radius of 50 km and maximum time of 30 days and cases were aggregated into intervals of seven days. The maximum time was based on the length of the rearing period for broilers that was approximately 30 days.
To identify clusters not caused by high population density, a Poisson regression analysis was performed on each of the datasets to obtain the expected number of cases. For human cases, human population density was included in the model and for broiler cases broiler house density was included. The expected numbers of cases were used as the population counts in the SaTScan™ models.
To test for statistical significance, 999 replications of Monte Carlo hypothesis testing were conducted. The level of significance was set to p ≥ 0.05. The analysis was adjusted to only include clusters with cases present simultaneously in both datasets. To identify areas where clusters were present recurrently during the years, the municipalities included in clusters were aggregated by year. In addition, the proportion of human cases located inside a cluster, as well as the proportion of broiler cases located within a cluster each year, was calculated. The locations of the clusters was visualised with ArcGIS 9.2 (ESRI, Redlands, CA, USA).
Statistical and space-time analyses
The current results suggest that space-time clusters of Campylobacter spp. in man and in broiler simultaneously occur in all of the investigated years. They occur almost only in the summer months and in certain parts of Norway more frequently than in others. In Norway, poultry slaughterhouses are few and large scale. Poultry meat originating from one farm is widely distributed throughout the country. Occurrence of local production of poultry meat, where the poultry are raised, slaughtered, retailed and consumed in the same area, is negligible and thereby the vast majority of human cases of campylobacteriosis will certainly not be caused by consumption of broiler meat from neighbouring farms. Thus, the results in the present study indicate that there could be local factors, some possibly common for man and broilers, which prompt the occurrence of human campylobacteriosis and of Campylobacter spp. colonisation in broilers in specific areas. In other countries it has been demonstrated that the same sequence types (ST's) to a large extent are found in both man and in broiler [5, 21]. On the other hand, Levesque et al. found, when investigating clonal complexes of Campylobacter jejuni from different sources, that sporadic Campylobacter jejuni infections in man may frequently arise from sources other than broilers . Sequence typing has not been performed on Norwegian strains. It would be interesting to investigate the geographical dissemination of different ST's combined with information on sources. However, some research has been done where geographical differences of ST's from sheep and cattle and from a rural environment have been investigated [23, 24]. A possible identification of the same ST's in man and in broiler in the same geographical area could be related to external factors acting as reservoirs or vectors/vehicles for dissemination. Broiler flocks that are positive might contaminate the environment, particularly if untreated litter is deposited outside. In a Norwegian study, it was shown that a Campylobacter spp. subtype found in one broiler flock was also found in a neighbouring flock some weeks later . In Denmark it was shown that flies adjacent to the broiler house could be contaminated with Campylobacter spp. and that large number of flies had access to the broiler house via the ventilation system, suggesting that flies could be a vector/vehicle for transmission between farms . It has also been suggested that the incidence of human campylobacteriosis was higher in populations living in rural and agricultural areas, with the highest rates occurring in populations living in proximity to high densities of farm animals [27, 28] and in a recent EFSA opinion on the quantification of the risk posed by broiler meat to human campylobacteriosis, it was stated that broiler meat might account for 20% to 30% of human campylobacteriosis, while chicken as a reservoir might account for 50% to 80%, for instance by strains from chicken contaminating drinking water, crop land or lakes . In Norway, up to 19.6% of the human cases in broiler areas were located within a space-time cluster yearly, indicating there are factors other than broilers that are important in contributing to sporadic campylobacteriosis in these areas. In the current study, the observed patterns may be influenced by factors acting on both global and local scales. In some areas clusters occurred every year, suggesting that factors acting on a local scale were involved. Such factors could be climate, landscape or geography. Human campylobacteriosis and colonisation of broilers in Norway, as in other European countries, follow a seasonal pattern with a peak in the summer [17, 29] strongly suggesting that climate plays a role. Variation in climate was previously described as having an effect on the occurrence in both broilers and man [29, 30]. However, more knowledge about the impact of climate is needed.
The sensitivity of the sampling of broiler flocks in the Action Plan was not estimated, but with the practice of two samples per flock at different time points, high within-flock prevalence and a sampling regime in accordance with the EU Baseline survey on Campylobacter spp. in broiler flocks, the flock-level sensitivity of the sampling is thought to be high. The aim of the Action Plan was to identify most possible flocks colonised with Campylobacter spp., to be able to effectuate interventions such as deep freezing or heat treatment of the carcasses when a positive flock was identified.
When studying phenomena that occur in different populations where there might be common environmental or other sources, analysing clusters that occur simultaneously in all populations could assist in generating a hypothesis of such sources. In the current study, an approach in SaTScan™, where it was possible to analyse multiple datasets simultaneously without combining the datasets beforehand was used . As the analyses were performed for both space and time, it would probably be very few clusters that overlapped exactly in space and time if the analyses were performed univariately. In addition, Kulldorff et al  claim that there could be loss of power if the datasets are analysed univariately.
Though most cases of campylobacteriosis are sporadic, some local outbreaks are identified in Norway every year, probably most often with a point source of infection, e.g. drinking water. The epidemiology of outbreaks might be different than that of sporadic campylobacteriosis. In the current study some significant clusters were identified where only human cases and not broiler cases were present. It was assumed that local outbreaks of human campylobacteriosis were causing high log likelihoods without contribution of the log likelihoods from the broiler cases. These clusters were not included in the results because the objective was to investigate simultaneous clusters of Campylobacter spp. in both humans and in broilers. Because only one third of the human population was included in the analyses, some clusters due to outbreaks were not detected. One example is the large Røros outbreak of campylobacteriosis in May 2007 , where Røros municipality did not have a broiler population and therefore was not included in the study. In addition, campylobacteriosis is probably, as is the case with most acute infectious enteric diseases, highly underreported. If there was a geographically skewed distribution of cases, for instance if there was geographical variation in how prone people were to visit health care providers during an incidence of a diarrhoeal disorder or how thorough health care personnel were in collecting samples from patients with such symptoms, this could have led to biased results by over- or underestimating the number of cases in different geographical areas.
In areas with a broiler population, simultaneous local space-time clusters of Campylobacter spp. cases in humans and in broilers were identified in all investigated years. The occurrence of such clusters combined with the knowledge that poultry meat has a nation-wide distribution indicates that campylobacteriosis cases might also be caused by other risk factors than consumption and handling of poultry meat.
Broiler farms with Campylobacter spp. positive flocks could contaminate the environment with further spread to new broiler farms or to humans living in the area and local environmental factors, such as climate, might influence the spread of Campylobacter spp. in an area. Further studies to clarify the role of such factors are needed.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the poultry industry represented by their farms and the Norwegian Food Safety Authority for performing the sampling and also the staff at the different laboratories for performing the laboratory analyses in the Action Plan. In addition, the authors would like to acknowledge Anja Bråthen Kristoffersen for valuable help with statistics.
- European Food Safety Authority: The Community Summary Report on Trends and Sources of Zoonoses and Zoonotic Agents in the European Union in 2007. 2009Google Scholar
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health: 2010, Last accessed 23-2-2010., http://www.fhi.no/eway/default.aspx?pid=233&trg=MainLeft_5799&MainArea_5661=5799:0:15,1904:1:0:0:::0:0&MainLeft_5799=5544:55563::1:5800:17:::0:0
- Moore JE, Corcoran D, Dooley JSG, Fanning S, Lucey B, Matsuda M, McDowell DA, Megraud F, Millar BC, O'Mahony R: Campylobacter. Vet Res. 2005, 36: 351-382. 10.1051/vetres:2005012.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nylen G, Dunstan F, Palmer SR, Andersson Y, Bager F, Cowden J, Feierl G, Galloway Y, Kapperud G, Megraud F: The seasonal distribution of campylobacter infection in nine European countries and New Zealand. Epidemiol Infect. 2002, 128: 383-390. 10.1017/S0950268802006830.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gormley FJ, MacRae M, Forbes KJ, Ogden ID, Dallas JF, Strachan NJ: Has retail chicken played a role in the decline of human campylobacteriosis?. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008, 74: 383-390. 10.1128/AEM.01455-07.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ): Scientific opinion on quantification of the risk posed by broiler meat to human campylobacteriosis in the EU. EFSA Journal. 2010Google Scholar
- Jacobs-Reitsma WF, van de Giessen AW, Bolder NM, Mulder RWAW: Epidemiology of Campylobacter spp. at two Dutch broiler farms. Epidemiol Infect. 1995, 114: 413-421. 10.1017/S0950268800052122.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shreeve JE, Toszeghy M, Pattison M, Newell DG: Sequential spread of Campylobacter infection in a multipen broiler house. Avian Dis. 2000, 44: 983-988. 10.2307/1593076.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McDowell SWJ, Menzies FD, McBride SH, Oza AN, McKenna JP, Gordon AW, Neill SD: Campylobacter spp. in conventional broiler flocks in Northern Ireland: epidemiology and risk factors. Prev Vet Med. 2008, 84: 261-276. 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.12.010.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ogden ID, MacRae M, Johnston M, Strachan NJ, Cody AJ, Dingle KE, Newell DG: Use of multilocus sequence typing to investigate the association between the presence of Campylobacter spp. in broiler drinking water and Campylobacter colonization in broilers. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007, 73: 5125-5129. 10.1128/AEM.00884-07.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barrios PR, Reiersen J, Lowman R, Bisaillon JR, Michel P, Fridriksdottir V, Gunnarsson E, Stern N, Berke O, McEwen S: Risk factors for Campylobacter spp. colonization in broiler flocks in Iceland. Prev Vet Med. 2006, 74: 264-278. 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.12.003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bouwknegt M, van de Giessen AW, Dam-Deisz WDC, Havelaar AH, Nagelkerke NJD, Henken AM: Risk factors for the presence of Campylobacter spp. in Dutch broiler flocks. Prev Vet Med. 2004, 62: 35-49. 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2003.09.003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kapperud G, Skjerve E, Vik L, Hauge K, Lysaker A, Aalmen I, Ostroff SM, Potter M: Epidemiological investigation of risk factors for campylobacter colonization in Norwegian broiler flocks. Epidemiol Infect. 1993, 111: 245-255. 10.1017/S0950268800056958.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Refregier-Petton J, Rose N, Denis M, Salvat G: Risk factors for Campylobacter spp. contamination in French broiler-chicken flocks at the end of the rearing period. Prev Vet Med. 2001, 50: 89-100. 10.1016/S0167-5877(01)00220-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lyngstad TM, Jonsson ME, Hofshagen M, Heier BT: Risk factors associated with the presence of Campylobacter species in Norwegian broiler flocks. Poult Sci. 2008, 87: 1987-1994. 10.3382/ps.2008-00132.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gibbens JC, Pascoe SJS, Evans SJ, Davies RH, Sayers AR: A trial of biosecurity as a means to control Campylobacter infection of broiler chickens. Prev Vet Med. 2001, 48: 85-99. 10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00189-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hofshagen M, Opheim M: The surveillance and control programme for Campylobacter in broiler flocks in Norway. Annual report 2007: Surveillance and control programmes for terrestrial and aquatic animals in Norway. Edited by: Brun E, Jordsmyr HM, Hellberg H, Sviland S. 2008, National Veterinary Institute, 131-134.Google Scholar
- Jonsson ME, Norström M, Sandberg M, Ersbøll AK, Hofshagen M: Space-time patterns of Campylobacter spp. colonization in broiler flocks, 2002-2006. Epidemiol Infect. 2010, 138: 1336-1345. 10.1017/S0950268810000051.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kulldorff M: A spatial scan statistic. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods. 1997, 26: 1481-1496. 10.1080/03610929708831995.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kulldorff M, Mostashari F, Duczmal L, Katherine Yih W, Kleinman K, Platt R: Multivariate scan statistics for disease surveillance. Stat Med. 2007, 26: 1824-1833. 10.1002/sim.2818.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wilson DJ, Gabriel E, Leatherbarrow AJH, Cheesbrough J, Gee S, Bolton E, Fox A, Fearnhead P, Hart CA, Diggle PJ: Tracing the source of campylobacteriosis. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4 (9): e1000203-10.1371/journal.pgen.1000203.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lévesque S, Frost E, Arbeit RD, Michaud S: Multilocus sequence typing of Campylobacter jejuni isolates from humans, chickens, raw milk, and environmental water in Quebec, Canada. J Clin Microbiol. 2008, 46: 3404-3411. 10.1128/JCM.00042-08.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rotariu O, Dallas JF, Ogden ID, MacRae M, Sheppard SK, Maiden MC, Gormley FJ, Forbes KJ, Strachan NJ: Spatiotemporal homogeneity of Campylobacter subtypes from cattle and sheep across northeastern and southwestern Scotland. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009, 75: 6275-6281. 10.1128/AEM.00499-09.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- French N, Barrigas M, Brown P, Ribiero P, Williams N, Leatherbarrow H, Birtles R, Bolton E, Fearnhead P, Fox A: Spatial epidemiology and natural population structure of Campylobacter jejuni colonizing a farmland ecosystem. Environ Microbiol. 2005, 7: 1116-1126. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00782.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Johnsen G, Kruse H, Hofshagen M: Genetic diversity and description of transmission routes for Campylobacter on broiler farms by amplified-fragment length polymorphism. J Appl Microbiol. 2006, 101: 1130-1139. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02995.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hald B, Skovgard H, Bang DD, Pedersen K, Dybdahl J, Jespersen JB, Madsen M: Flies and Campylobacter infection of broiler flocks. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004, 10: 1490-1492.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Green CG, Krause DO, Wylie JL: Spatial analysis of campylobacter infection in the Canadian province of Manitoba. Int J Health Geogr. 2006, 5: 2-10.1186/1476-072X-5-2.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ethelberg S, Simonsen J, Gerner-Smidt P, Olsen KE, Mølbak K: Spatial distribution and registry-based case-control analysis of Campylobacter infections in Denmark, 1991-2001. Am J Epidemiol. 2005, 162: 1008-1015. 10.1093/aje/kwi316.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jore S, Viljugrein H, Brun E, Heier BT, Borck B, Ethelberg S, Hakkinen M, Kuusi M, Reiersen J, Hansson I: Trends in Campylobacter incidence in broilers and humans in six European countries, 1997-2007. Prev Vet Med. 2010, 93: 33-41. 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.09.015.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Patrick ME, Christiansen LE, Waino M, Ethelberg S, Madsen H, Wegener HC: Effects of climate on incidence of Campylobacter spp. in humans and prevalence in broiler flocks in Denmark. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004, 70: 7474-7480. 10.1128/AEM.70.12.7474-7480.2004.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jakopanec I, Borgen K, Vold L, Lund H, Forseth T, Hannula R, Nygard K: A large waterborne outbreak of campylobacteriosis in Norway: the need to focus on distribution system safety. BMC Infect Dis. 2008, 8: 128-10.1186/1471-2334-8-128.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.