Process | Challenge | Advantages | Uncertainties |
---|---|---|---|
Step 1: Delimitation of the study area | Mastery of the of Google Earth software Knowing the boundaries of the study area and the remarkable morphological features (hydrography, orography, main arteries, stadiums, etc.) | Choice of the entire study area itself upstream Is done randomly Overview of the city and all potential sampling areas regardless of their surface area | The possibility of encountering areas without habitats |
Step 2: Neighbourhoods selection | Mastery of Google Earth software Delimited areas do not follow a regular grid The distances between areas are randomly selected and obey only random sampling criteria | The choice is random and easy to make with the R software Easy data cleaning process involving the previous steps Possibility to select at the finest spatial resolution Independence in the choice of sites No redundancy in the choice of neighbourhoods | Do not know in advance the number of lots/neighbourhoods that will emerge |
Step 3: Household selection | Have a good internet connection speed | Precise The possibility of avoiding bias by clearly identifying habitats Advanced knowledge of the number of houses to select Random sampling and easy to make with R software | |
Step 4: Integration of points in the GPS | Mastering the conversion of file formats (Kml to GPX) | Automatically done from Qgis to GPS | |
Step 5: Field campaign | Training the investigator to master the use of GPS and map reading | Easy recognition on fields of previously identified sites and locations Quite inexpensive because the investigator does not waste time in identifying the field | Possibility to find new habitats set up between the date of the images and the date of the fieldwork |