Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

The role of geographic information system and global positioning system in dementia care and research: a scoping review

International Journal of Health Geographics volume 21, Article number: 8 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Geographic Information System (GIS) and Global Positioning System (GPS), vital tools for supporting public health research, provide a framework to collect, analyze and visualize the interaction between different levels of the health care system. The extent to which GIS and GPS applications have been used in dementia care and research is not yet investigated. This scoping review aims to elaborate on the role and types of GIS and GPS applications in dementia care and research.

Methods

A scoping review was conducted based on Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. All published articles in peer-reviewed journals were searched in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, subject to involving at least one GIS/GPS approach focused on dementia. Eligible studies were reviewed, grouped, and synthesized to identify GIS and GPS applications. The PRISMA standard was used to report the study.

Results

Ninety-two studies met our inclusion criteria, and their data were extracted. Six types of GIS/GPS applications had been reported in dementia literature including mapping and surveillance (n = 59), data preparation (n = 26), dementia care provision (n = 18), basic research (n = 18), contextual and risk factor analysis (n = 4), and planning (n = 1). Thematic mapping and GPS were most frequently used techniques in the dementia field.

Conclusions

Even though the applications of GIS/GPS methodologies in dementia care and research are growing, there is limited research on GIS/GPS utilization in dementia care, risk factor analysis, and dementia policy planning. GIS and GPS are space-based systems, so they have a strong capacity for developing innovative research based on spatial analysis in the area of dementia. The existing research has been summarized in this review which could help researchers to know the GIS/GPS capabilities in dementia research.

Background

Over 55 million people are estimated to live with dementia worldwide, with an increase of nearly 10 million new cases yearly [1]. This places a significant financial burden on health care systems and societies. The cost of caring for people with dementia was estimated about 818 billion US dollars (about 1.1% of global gross domestic product) worldwide in 2015 and is estimated to be more than two trillion US dollars by 2030 [1]. Given the growing socioeconomic impacts of dementia, many studies have focused on factors, from individual to environmental, associated with the development of this disorder [2,3,4]. Although understanding these associations is essential for the development of treatment and preventive strategies [3], understanding the spatial pattern of dementia over space and time using the Geographic Information System (GIS) and Global Positioning System (GPS) is essential for designing tailored interventions at the population level [5].

GIS is a kind of information systems that can be used to manage, analyze, and visualize geographic information. The first applications of GIS in health, more defined as spatial analysis, was creating a map to visually represent cholera outbreaks across 48 Paris districts in 1832 [6] and John Snow's work to map and  visualize the source of a cholera outbreak in London in 1854 [7]. Roger Tomlinson developed the first computerized GIS in 1963 [8]. These computerized systems have continued to be applied in public health research to understand the distribution of diseases. GIS has a unique capacity to link data from different sources (e.g., individual, locational and organizational databases) and identify and visualize geographic variations in disease patterns over time and space [5, 9]. In addition, policymakers can use GIS capabilities to quantify the interaction between different levels of dementia care and design geographically targeted interventions [5, 10].

Recently, GIS has been used for dementia research by combining spatial and non-spatial data into one framework to analyze the dementia care system [10, 11]. For instance, researchers used GIS to study high-risk areas by identifying potenteil spatial autocorrelation in the distribution of dementia patients [12]. Furthermore, some studies used explanatory spatial analysis to identify associations between dementia occurrence and environmental risk factors [13]. GIS can also be used to measure spatial accessibility to healthcare services [14], determining the spatial distribution of medicines [15] or services needed by patients [16].

GPS is a space-based navigation system that collects and provides data about positioning, navigation, and timing [17]. GPS was originally intended for use in the military but then widely used in healthcare, especially for mental health disorders, to monitor, follow, track and manage the care process of patients [18, 19]. GPS assesses and analyses patients’ out-of-home and driving behavior [20,21,22,23,24,25]. Out-of-home behavior patterns can predict cognitive impairment disorders [21]. Some studies use GPS to collect activity data to detect real-time disoriented behavior and the uniformity of a patient’s walking. GPS has also been used as real-time navigation assistance [26]. Collected data by this system defines the activity space of patients to assess their social health and independent activity [27].

Many studies used GIS and GPS in health research [28]. The different GIS/GPS applications in dementia field emphasize the need to systematically synthesize and summarize the relevant studies. This can contribute to identify the potential gaps in the utilization of these space-based systems in dementia care and research. However, there is no review article on using these systems in dementia context. Therefore, this scoping review aims to synthesize the literature, understand the role of GIS and GPS in dementia care and research and elaborate on their applications in this field. Our results can help researchers to know the different capabilities of GIS and GPS in dementia setting.

Methods

We implemented the scoping review method according to Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework and the PRISMA standard [29]. Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework provides a guideline for conducting a scoping review. It consists of five steps: identification of the research question, identification of the relevant studies, selection of included studies, charting the key elements, and summarizing and reporting the results [30]. The PRISMA is an evidence-based standard with minimum essential items used for reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses [31]. This study used PRISMA-ScR, a PRISMA extension intended to apply for scoping reviews (Additional file 1. PRISMA-ScR-Checklist). This standard, published in 2018, contains 20 essential and two optional items and helps to improve the reporting of scoping reviews [32].

Identifying the research question

What are the different applications of GIS and GPS in dementia care and research, and what methodologies based on GIS and GPS were used in dementia literature?

Identifying the relevant studies

Search strategy

A comprehensive search strategy was developed by combining the related keywords to retrieve all dementia and Alzheimer’s studies using a GIS/GPS approach. Additionaly,  a set of MeSH terms were applied in the search strategy to implement a broad search in PubMed. The  concepts taken in this review are summarized in Table 1, and the complete search strategy for each database is provided in Additional file2. Search strategy.

Table 1 Comprehensive set of concepts used in search strategy
Full size table

Information sources

PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched to retrieve articles published up to June 06, 2022, with no geographic restrictions and time limitations. Searches were limited to English studies and focused on human subjects at individual and population levels. The results were imported into Endnote X8 reference management tool (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, PA, USA), and duplicate references were removed from the results.

The search strategies identified 3667 citations from the three databases. After removing duplicates and excluding irrelevant articles based on title and abstract screening, 239 articles remained for an in-depth review, of which 147 did not meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Finally, 92 studies were included and considered for data extraction (Fig. 1) (Additional file 3. Extraction Table).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of study selection. Excluded reports may have had more than one reason for exclusion, but only one reason was listed here

Full size image

Selection studies

Eligibility criteria

Original studies published in peer-reviewed journals which  written in English were considered in this study.

Studies were eligible for inclusion if they met one of the following criteria:

  1. 1.

    Applied at least one GIS approach in dementia or severe cognitive impairment (if it had been clinically diagnosed as dementia).

  2. 2.

    Studies focused on GPS technology if dementia/Alzheimer patients had used the GPS, and the gathered data by GPS was analyzed.

Studies were excluded if:

  1. 1.

    They only assessed the attitudes of patients, their families, or professional caregivers toward using GPS-based technology.

  2. 2.

    They only assessed the ethical aspects of using GIS/GPS.

  3. 3.

    They focused on system design and development, technology acceptance, user experience, usability, and utility.

  4. 4.

    The interview or questionnaire-based studies used neither a GIS approach nor any analysis regarding GPS data.

  5. 5.

    Studies only used sensors to track people with dementia and did not use any GIS approaches.

  6. 6.

    The studies without any human participants or considering only healthy volunteers without any patients as their subjects or focused on birds, rats, and other animals.

The reviews and non-peer-reviewed literatures such as editorials, conference or congress papers, book sections, and study protocols were excluded from the study.

Screening process

The expert panels of the authors with expertise in GIS, spatial analysis and Alzheimer’s disease were held. The meetings were set up for study design, conceptualization, category definition, methodology, and data extraction. At the first screening step, the authors independently evaluated the title and abstract of retrieved articles (NF, HT, MF, JS, VL). Irrelevant studies were excluded against the mentioned criteria. Then screened articles were double-checked by the first author, and if she had any doubts, a meeting was organized and the consensus opinion was considered and resolved by group discussion. Finally, the full text of potentially relevant articles was reviewed, and eligible studies were identified for data extraction.

Charting the data

A checklist was designed for data extraction (see data items part). Six authors (NF, HT, BK, AR, JS, VL) extracted the data independently. The first author aggregated the extraction results, and a double-check was performed by her.

To extract GIS applications, the first author prepared an initial list based on two similar studies [7, 33]. This list was assessed and discussed  in the meetings and includes four main categories; disease mapping, planning, access and care, and risk factor analysis. In this list, the “other applications” category was considered to record different items that were impossible to assign to the four groups. After data extraction, expert panel members assessed and discussed recorded items in this category in meetings. If these items could be placed in the main categories, they had been assigned to them, such as disease surveillance assigned to the disease mapping category. However, the rest of the items were labelled as two new categories; “basic research” and “data preparation”. Finally, the authors discussed and agreed on the final list. Thus, six categories of GIS/GPS applications were considered in this study.

Data items

For each eligible article, the following data items were extracted: title, author (s), year of publication, study location (country), study populations, outcome measures, intervention type, geographical level of analysis (scale), the aim of the study, main results (GIS-related key findings), type of GIS/GPS methodology, geospatial analysis technique/ technology, type of GIS/GPS application. Each study could use more than one method and technique and had more than one application. The categories of GIS/GPS methodology were classified into five types.

Types of GIS methodology:

  • Thematic mapping: A type of map that visualizes invisible spatial patterns of a phenomenon or provides some information about a geographical area. This study includes several kinds of maps, such as inset map, choropleth map, heat map, and buffer map [34].

  • Spatial modelling: Constructing models to comprehensively analyze spatial and non-spatial properties [34, 35]. Spatial modelling includes spatial agent-based modelling [36,37,38], spatial regression modelling [39], and spatial network analysis [40, 41].

  • Web GIS: An architectural approach that provides a platform for spatial data analysis and spatial pattern visualization by building interactive web maps such as online spatial dashboards, interactive mapping, or online mapping [42, 43].

  • GIS/GPS tools and technology: This category includes a wide range of tools and technologies for gathering, analyzing and combining spatial data, such as GPS, a navigation system providing location and time information [44].

  • Space-time clustering: A spatial analysis to identify clustering of spatial patterns in a geographic area over time [45,46,47], such as Space-Time Scan Statistics [48].

Collating, summarizing, and reporting results

The geographical distribution of the included studies was visualized in ArcGIS Desktop software (ESRI, Redlands, CA, USA). Microsoft Excel was employed to create appropriate charts and tables to summarize the results.

Results

Of 92 eligible studies, 11 articles used data from two or more countries [12, 21, 49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57]. Two studies applied worldwide data [55, 56] and one used only continental Europe data [57]. Most studies reported data from the United States (n = 33), the United Kingdom (n = 14) and Germany (n = 11). The first study was published in 1975, and between 1975 and 2010, only 14 studies were published. However, the number of studies rapidly increased, and 78 studies were published during 2011–2022 (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Geographical variation of included studies and number of publications over time

Full size image

GIS/GPS methodologies in dementia care and research

The methodologies applied in the included studies were categorized as thematic mapping (n = 45), followed by spatial modelling and analysis (n = 37), GIS/GPS tools and technologies (n = 33), and space-time clustering (n = 11) (Fig. 3a). No study employed web GIS methodology for data analysis and visualization.

As shown in Fig. 3b, the usage of GIS methodology in dementia has increased over time, particularly since 2014. Thematic mapping was the earliest methodology used in dementia; there were only 14 studies between 1975 and 2014, but its use has increased rapidly since 2015. The focus on spatial modelling and analysis has increased since 2015. The initial use of space-time clustering goes back to 2014, and the usage trend did not change over time.

Different types of techniques were used in each category (Additional file 4. Techniques). All these techniques are listed and weighted based on frequency in Fig. 3e. As Figure 3 shows, mapping and GPS, which belong to the thematic mapping and GIS/GPS technology categories, respectively, were used frequently and much more than other techniques in dementia research. Note that we have not shown the number of studies for 2022 in figure 3 as our search strategy was conducted in the middle of 2022 and due to incomplete data of 2022, the time trend will not be correct.

Fig. 3
figure 3

GIS/GPS methodologies and applications

Full size image

GIS/GPS applications in dementia care and research

Six main domains of GIS/GPS applications in dementia research were identified including mapping and surveillance (n = 59), data preparation (n = 26) dementia care (n = 18), basic research (n = 18), contextual and risk factor analysis (n = 4), and planning (n = 1) (Fig. 3c). GIS mainly was used for thematic mapping from 1975 to 2010, but the GIS approaches and the frequency of GIS applications have increased since 2011. GIS/GPS techniques have been used in basic research since 2011 and for policy planning purposes in 2019 (Fig. 3d). A comprehensive definition for each group of applications is provided in Table 2.

Table 2 Comprehensive definition of each GIS/GPS application in dementia care and research
Full size table

Mapping and surveillance

The studies in this category focused on any visualization for dementia-related outcomes. Most maps were applied to visualize the spatial and temporal patterns of dementia/Alzheimer’s mortality [49, 50, 55, 68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78] and hospital admission rates [79]. Some visualized spatial distribution of birthplace of dementia patients [80, 81], the area with high concentration [82], incidents of missing patients with dementia [83], dementia risk/rate [4, 12, 57, 84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93], hospice use [94], opioid use [95], and antipsychotic drug use [15]. Some studies used mapping in preparing exposure data [67], arsenic concentrations [96], ozone levels [97], spatial distributions of air pollutants [98] and ranking countries in medical tourism [56]. Three studies mapped access to services [14, 16, 99], and only one used resource allocation related to the care of dementia patients [64]. Also, one study used mapping to visualize patients’ mobility patterns [100].

Data preparation

The studies in this category mainly used spatial analyses to prepare data for non-spatial models. These spatial analyses include spatial interpolation [57, 66, 81, 96,97,98, 101, 102], buffer analysis [54, 67, 102,103,104,105], overlay analysis [97], land-use regression [4, 106], satellite imaging [107], aerial photograph analysis [108], space syntax analysis [109], noise estimation [110], spatial linkage and aggregation [75, 87, 89, 111, 112], distance-based analysis [113]. These techniques were used to measure environmental factors such as air pollutant exposures [4, 57, 66, 97, 98, 101, 102, 106, 107], green and blue spaces [54, 102, 104, 105, 112], organophosphorus (OP) exposure [67], aluminum concentration [81], hilliness [103] and arsenic level [96]. Furthermore, the studies calculate sidewalk coverage [108] and neighborhood integration [109], estimate noise origination [110] and construct an area deprivation index [111]. Other applications were quantifying and preparing sociodemographic variables and risk factors at the statistical area level [87, 89, 93] and distance-based adjusting rates [113].

Basic research

This category includes basic research (not-applied studies) that assess and compare behavioral patterns [26], out-of-home mobility [65], or other concepts to understand the patients’ situation better. Eighteen studies were identified in this category, and all applied GPS as a space-based technology to gather tracking data in exploring patients’ behavior patterns. In most studies, analysis and interpretation of spatial GPS data were used to assess patients’ out-of-home behavior [20,21,22,23], mobility patterns [52, 53, 65, 114,115,116,117], life-space metrics [118, 119], and driving behavior [24, 25]. In one study, GPS data were used to propose a Bayesian classifier model to estimate the probability of wandering [120].

Another study in this category assessed GPS-based data quality and validity based on compliance rates of the participants with study protocol and requirements [121]. Further, a study compared behavioral competence and the emotional well-being of mild cognitive impairment adults with a healthy group and persons with dementia. This study identified more similarities in mild cognitive impairment adults’ behavior compared to the dementia group [51].

Contextual and risk factor analysis

Four studies used GIS models to investigate the association of contextual and environmental risk factors with dementia-related outcomes. A study used the Ordinary Least Squares regression model to test the potential association of neighborhood-level disadvantage with cognitive decline. Highly disadvantaged neighborhoods measured by Area Deprivation Index were associated with neurodegeneration and cognitive decline [122]. Another study applied spatial buffer analysis and ordinary least sqaure to explore the association between dementia-related missing incidents and outdoor landmarks. The high density of outdoor landmarks was identified as an environmental risk factor for getting lost [83]. The spatial Cox proportional hazards model assessed the relationship between exposure to air pollutants and PM2.5 with dementia incidence [106]. Further, satellite imaging analysis identified the correlation between the number of mining sites and dementia mortality in another study [123].

Dementia care

Eighteen papers applied GIS/GPS approaches in dementia care. Most studies in this category focused on GPS technologies (N = 12). They used GPS embedded in a smartwatch [61, 124], Personal Digital Assistant [125], mobile phone [126, 127], and other portable tracking devices [27, 124, 128,129,130]. Most applied GPS to get real-time health data to track and predict typical locations and movements and detect spatial disorientation patterns to provide appropriate assistive services [26, 124, 125, 127, 129, 130]. Some studies used data to explore activity space to examine social health [27], understand everyday life through socio-spatial relational care [100], understand the effect of caregivers burden on behavioral and emotional status of care recipients [128], and monitor and manage patients’ health and locations [61, 126]. In one of the studies, GPS was used to help people with mild Alzheimer disease to improve their driving performance and safety [131].

Five articles focused on health access using GIS approaches such as distance-based analysis [14, 16, 64, 99, 132] and geo-simulation [99] to measure spatial accessibility in the USA [16, 99], Ireland [14], Taiwan [64] and Japan [132]. Three studies examined accessibility to services [14, 16, 64] for patients and caregivers, and the other studies focused on accessibility to brain bank donation centers [99], and screening sites [132]. Only one study used descriptive mapping to visualize the geographical variation of drugs used in dementia care [15].

Planning

Only one study, conducted in Taiwan, fell in this category. Two new indicators were developed to facilitate dementia service allocations in this study. The indicators focused on supply and demand [64].

Association of GIS/GPS applications with the corresponding methodologies

The main application of thematic mapping was for dementia epidemiology and outcomes mapping (n = 45). Only one study used thematic mapping in dementia care [15] to visualize geographical variations of antipsychotic drugs used by patients. Most studies applied spatial modelling in data preparation (n = 25) to measure and compute exposures for non-spatial modelling. A few studies used spatial modelling such as ordinary least squares in contextual factor analysis (n = 4), and only one study was directly conducted in dementia planning. GIS/GPS tools and technologies, the most common of which was GPS (Fig. 3e), were most commonly applied in basic research (n = 18) and dementia care (n = 112). Finally, space-time clustering was only used to map dementia-related conditions (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

GIS/GPS applications associated with their corresponding methodologies

Full size image

Discussion

This study was undertaken as a state-of-the-art study regarding dementia research and care. The study aimed to understand the role of GIS, geospatial analysis and GPS technologies in dementia care and research. To our knowledge, this scoping review is the first literature review in this field. We found 92 studies published from 1975 to 2022, demonstrating that the applications of GIS/GPS in dementia research have considerably grown over the past decade as GIS and GPS technology expanded and evolved. This study revealed six main applications of these systems in dementia care and research, including mapping or surveillance, dementia care and accessibility, contextual/risk factor analysis, planning, basic research, and data preparation. While GIS has been widely used to map dementia-related conditions, they have been used very little in service planning for dementia care.

Thematic mapping and GPS data collection are widely used in dementia research. Mapping was the most popular application to visualize geographical patterns of dementia-related conditions or outcomes in the study areas. The application of GPS as an advanced data collection tool has been more frequent in recent years compared to previous decades. It can be due to progress in telecommunication and hardware technologies such as smartphones which caused better accessibility to GPS in recent years. Dementia affects a patient’s functionality in daily life. They have severe problems in everyday activities, and more than 73% experience getting lost [133], so healthcare systems have focused on GPS-used devices for monitoring and tracking patients [61].

Our scoping review showed that GIS had been used very little in dementia care (14.3%) and planning (0.8%). The later finding is even less than in similar areas such as multiple sclerosis (MS) (4%) [33] and mental health care (15%) [134]. Policy planning and resource allocation are critical for optimal care of dementia across communities [135]. This is a real gap in the area of dementia. GIS has a unique capacity for identifying and visualizing unmet needs areas for policy interventions. GIS can reveal and visualize complex relationships between cases in both time and space. This visualization helps policymakers identify high-risk areas to implement the best response strategies. Location-based information supports healthcare needs assessment to resource management. In this capacity, public health officials can analyze and manage population-based health problems efficiently [136, 137]. GIS can support public health managers in making proper decisions and planning by addressing issues such as available health resource allocations [138], control and prevention of disease, and cost management [136]. Furthermore, GIS can link spatial and non-spatial characteristics of dementia care services/providers and visualize care provision across local areas and within different population groups. This will provide new knowledge for evidence-informed policy planning in dementia care and research.

Policymakers could use advanced space-time modelling/clustering to identify variations in service provision over space and time and design geographically targeted interventions. Furthermore, this research demonstrated that the use of GPS has increased in recent years, particularly in data collection for primary and secondary dementia care and even in rehabilitation services for dementia care and research. This capability can help researchers collect precise geo-linked data and in high-quality data preparation in dementia research. The utilization of GPS, for example, in monitoring the pattern of walkability in people living with dementia is an important application of space-based systems in the tertiary care of dementia across communities [26, 53, 116]. Additionally, researchers have been using advanced tracking systems combined with GIS methodologies such as remote sensing in dementia research [66]. This technology can provide high-resolution environmental characteristics, and researchers could use this first-hand information to model contextual and environmental risk (e.g., air pollution) and protective factors (e.g., access to publicly open green and blue spaces). However, despite of Web-GIS potential for real-time data management, query, and visualization, it is surprising that this review has not found examples of web-based GIS applications in dementia, when there are successful examples of its use for other chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular [139], diabetes [140], or cancer [141].

Most of the studies were conducted in the United States, followed by UK, Germany and Canada. The low level of publications in other European countries is striking, given the fact that dementia is a top priority in this world region [142]. Unlike multiple sclerosis, which has the most studies in European countries [33], there is a significant gap in GIS/GPS studies in dementia research and care in these countries. We suggest doing more research in this area in future studies. Also, poor service availability and accessibility to dementia-related medical services can negatively affect patients’ life quality [64, 93]. So, more research on resource allocation and policy planning is needed in all countries.

The strength of the current research work is that comprehensive search terms were developed to ensure no article relevant to GIS/GPS and dementia has been missed. Additionally, we applied our search terms to three main databases (PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus) in a health context to retrieve the related papers. Further, the research team had four GIS experts, enabling us to review the articles and properly apply inclusion criteria precisely. However, limiting our search strategy to English articles might not provide a whole picture of the role of GIS/GPS in dementia research.

Conclusions

Six main applications of GIS and GPS were revealed in this study. Most studies focused on thematic mapping and GPS in the dementia field. Even though the applications of GIS/GPS methodologies and data collection tools in dementia care and research are growing over the past decade, the low number of publications in the European countries is striking. Thus, more analyses using GIS/GPS technologies in European nations are recommended. There is a significant gap in the utilization of GIS/GPS in service planning and dementia care, particularly in resource allocation. Therefore,  more research on resource allocation and policy planning is needed in all countries.

Availability of data and materials

All relevant data are included in the manuscript.

Abbreviations

GIS:

Geographic Information Systems

GPS:

Global Positioning Systems

References

  1. Organization WH. Global action plan on the public health response to dementia 2017–2025. 2017.

  2. Angelucci F, Cechova K, Valis M, Kuca K, Zhang B, Hort J. MicroRNAs in Alzheimer’s disease: diagnostic markers or therapeutic agents? Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:665. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00665.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Fish PV, Steadman D, Bayle ED, Whiting P. New approaches for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2019;29(2):125–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2018.11.034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bagheri N, Mavoa S, Tabatabaei-Jafari H, Knibbs LD, Coffee NT, Salvador-Carulla L, et al. The impact of built and social environmental characteristics on diagnosed and estimated future risk of dementia. J Alzheimer’s Dis JAD. 2021;84(2):621–32. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-210208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. McLafferty SL. GIS and health care. Annu Rev Public Health. 2003;24(1):25–42. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.24.012902.141012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Glover J. Unity 2018 augmented reality projects: build four immersive and fun AR applications using ARKit, ARCore, and Vuforia: Packt Publishing Ltd; 2018.

  7. Shaw NT. Geographical information systems and health: current state and future directions. Healthc Informat Res. 2012;18(2):88–96. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2012.18.2.88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. ESRI. History of GIS. Available from: https://www.esri.com/en-us/what-is-gis/history-of-gis.

  9. Cromley EK, McLafferty SL. GIS and public health. Guilford Press; 2011. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2012.717629.

  10. Bagheri N, Wangdi K, Cherbuin N, Anstey KJ. Combining geospatial analysis with dementia risk utilising general practice data: a systematic review. J Prevent Alzheimer’s Dis. 2018;5(1):71–7. https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2017.33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Scerpella DL, Bouranis NG, Webster MJ, Dellapina M, Koeuth S, Parker LJ, et al. Using geographic information systems (GIS) for targeted national recruitment of community-dwelling caregivers managing dementia-related behavioral and psychological symptoms: a recruitment approach for a randomized clinical trial. J Geogr Inf Syst. 2021;13(3):302. https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2021.133017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Russ TC, Gatz M, Pedersen NL, Hannah J, Wyper G, Batty GD, et al. Geographical variation in dementia: examining the role of environmental factors in Sweden and Scotland. Epidemiology. 2015;26(2):263. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000230.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Killin LOJ, Starr JM, Shiue IJ, Russ TC. Environmental risk factors for dementia: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2016;16(1):175. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0342-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Pierse T, Keogh F, O’Shea E, Cullinan J. Geographic availability and accessibility of day care services for people with dementia in Ireland. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05341-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zakarias JK, Jensen-Dahm C, Nørgaard A, Stevnsborg L, Gasse C, Andersen BG, et al. Geographical variation in antipsychotic drug use in elderly patients with dementia: a Nationwide study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;54(3):1183–92. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-160485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Payne BK, Gainey RR. Mapping elder mistreatment cases: Interactions between mistreatment, dementia, service utilization, access to services, and disadvantage. J Hum Behav Soc Environ. 2009;19(8):1025–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911350903269203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Maddison R, Ni MC. Global positioning system: a new opportunity in physical activity measurement. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Topfer LA. GPS locator devices for people with dementia. CADTH Issues in Emerging Health Technologies. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health Copyright© CADTH 2016. You are permitted to reproduce this document for non-commercial purposes, provided it is not modified when reproduced and appropriate credit is given to CADTH; 2016.

  19. Øderud T, Landmark B, Eriksen S, Fossberg AB, Aketun S, Omland M, et al. Persons with dementia and their caregivers using GPS. Stud Health Technol Informat. 2015;217:212–21. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-566-1-212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaspar R, Oswald F, Wahl H-W, Voss E, Wettstein M. Daily mood and out-of-home mobility in older adults: does cognitive impairment matter? J Appl Gerontol. 2015;34(1):26–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464812466290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wettstein M, Wahl H-W, Shoval N, Oswald F, Voss E, Seidl U, et al. Out-of-home behavior and cognitive impairment in older adults: findings of the SenTra Project. J Appl Gerontol. 2015;34(1):3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464812459373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ghosh A, Puthusseryppady V, Chan D, Mascolo C, Hornberger M. Machine learning detects altered spatial navigation features in outdoor behaviour of Alzheimer’s disease patients. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06899-w.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Puthusseryppady V, Morrissey S, Aung MH, Coughlan G, Patel M, Hornberger M. Using GPS tracking to investigate outdoor navigation patterns in patients with Alzheimer disease: cross-sectional study. JMIR aging. 2022;5(2): e28222. https://doi.org/10.2196/28222.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Roe CM, Stout SH, Rajasekar G, Ances BM, Jones JM, Head D, et al. A 2.5-year longitudinal assessment of naturalistic driving in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2019;68(4):1625–33. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-181242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Davis JD, Babulal GM, Papandonatos GD, Burke EM, Rosnick CB, Ott BR, et al. Evaluation of naturalistic driving behavior using in-vehicle monitoring technology in preclinical and early Alzheimer’s disease. Front Psychol. 2020;11:2925. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.596257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schaat S, Koldrack P, Yordanova K, Kirste T, Teipel S. Real-time detection of spatial disorientation in persons with mild cognitive impairment and dementia. Gerontology. 2020;66(1):85–94. https://doi.org/10.1159/000500971.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sturge J, Klaassens M, Lager D, Weitkamp G, Vegter D, Meijering L. Using the concept of activity space to understand the social health of older adults living with memory problems and dementia at home. Soc Sci Med. 2021;288: 113208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shaw N, McGuire S. Understanding the use of geographical information systems (GIS) in health informatics research: a review. J Innov Health Informat. 2017;24(2):228–33. https://doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v24i2.940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. PRISMA. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. Available from: http://www.prisma-statement.org/documents/PRISMA-ScR-Fillable-Checklist_11Sept2019.pdf.

  30. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Available from: https://prisma-statement.org/.

  32. PRISMA for Scoping Reviews. Available from: https://www.prisma-statement.org//Extensions/ScopingReviews.

  33. Hashtarkhani S, Tabatabaei-Jafari H, Kiani B, Furst M, Salvador-Carulla L, Bagheri N. Use of geographical information systems in multiple sclerosis research: a systematic scoping review. Multiple Sclerosis Rel Disord. 2021;51: 102909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2021.102909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kalkhan MA. Spatial statistics: geospatial information modeling and thematic mapping: CRC Press; 2011. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439891117.

  35. Rocha J, Tenedório JA. Spatial analysis, modelling and planning: BoD-Books on Demand; 2018. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74452.

  36. Yang Y, Diez Roux AV, Auchincloss AH, Rodriguez DA, Brown DG. A spatial agent-based model for the simulation of adults’ daily walking within a city. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(3):353–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.11.017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Saarloos D, Kim JE, Timmermans H. The built environment and health: introducing individual space-time behavior. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009;6(6):1724–43. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph6061724.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. King AC, Satariano WA, Marti J, Zhu W. Multilevel modeling of walking behavior: advances in understanding the interactions of people, place, and time. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(7 Suppl):S584–93. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c66b7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Anselin L. Spatial regression. In: The SAGE handbook of spatial analysis. 2009; pp. 255–76.

  40. Entwisle B, Rindfuss RR, Walsh SJ, Evans TP, Curran SR. Geographic information systems, spatial network analysis, and contraceptive choice. Demography. 1997;34(2):171–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. O’Sullivan D. Spatial network analysis. In: Handbook of regional science. Berlin: Springer; 2014. p. 1253–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23430-9_67.

  42. Alesheikh AA, Helali H, Behroz H, editors. Web GIS: technologies and its applications. In: Symposium on geospatial theory, processing and applications; 2002.

  43. Fu P. Getting to know Web GIS: Esri Press Redlands, CA; 2015.

  44. Lange A, Gilbert C. Using GPS for GIS data capture. Geograph Inform Syst. 1999;1:467–76.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Anselin L. Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geogr Anal. 1995;27(2):93–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Getis A. Spatial autocorrelation. Handbook of applied spatial analysis. Berlin: Springer; 2010. pp. 255–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03647-7.

  47. Manepalli UR, Bham GH, Kandada S, editors. Evaluation of hotspots identification using kernel density estimation (K) and Getis-Ord (Gi*) on I-630. In: 3rd International Conference on Road Safety and Simulation; 2011.

  48. Kulldorff M, Heffernan R, Hartman J, Assunçao R, Mostashari F. A space–time permutation scan statistic for disease outbreak detection. PLoS Med. 2005;2(3): e59. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020059.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Figueroa R, Steenland K, MacNeil JR, Levey AI, Vega IE. Geographical differences in the occurrence of Alzheimer’s disease mortality: United States versus Puerto Rico. Am J Alzheimer’s Dis Other Demen. 2008;23(5):462–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317508321909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Russ TC, Murianni L, Icaza G, Slachevsky A, Starr JM. Geographical variation in dementia mortality in Italy, New Zealand, and Chile: the impact of latitude, vitamin D, and air pollution. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2016;42(1–2):31–41. https://doi.org/10.1159/000447449.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Center MP. Behavioral competence and emotional well-being of older adults with mild cognitive impairment: Comparison with cognitively healthy controls and individuals with early-stage dementia. GeroPsych J Gerontopsychol Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014;27(2):55–65. https://doi.org/10.1024/1662-9647/a000107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Wettstein M, Wahl H-W, Shoval N, Auslander G, Oswald F, Heinik J. Cognitive status moderates the relationship between out-of-home behavior (OOHB), environmental mastery and affect. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2014;59(1):113–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2014.03.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wettstein M, Wahl H-W, Shoval N, Auslander G, Oswald F, Heinik J. Identifying mobility types in cognitively heterogeneous older adults based on GPS-tracking: what discriminates best? J Appl Gerontol. 2015;34(8):1001–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464813512897.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wu Y-T, Brayne C, Liu Z, Huang Y, Sosa AL, Acosta D, et al. Neighbourhood environment and dementia in older people from high-, middle-and low-income countries: results from two population-based cohort studies. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09435-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Jiang Y, Man Q, Liu Z, Wang Y, Suo C, Jin L, et al. Temporal trends in the mortality rate of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias attributable to smoking, 1990–2017. Environ Res. 2020;184: 109183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109183.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Semenova ZA, Chistobaev AI, Dildina VP. A geographic approach to measuring and organising affordable medical and therapeutic tourism for people with dementia. Quaestion Geograph. 2020;39(4):65–71. https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2020-0035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Guzmán P, Tarín-Carrasco P, Morales-Suárez-Varela M, Jiménez-Guerrero P. Effects of air pollution on dementia over Europe for present and future climate change scenarios. Environ Res. 2022;204(Pt A): 112012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.112012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Lai P-C, So F-M, Chan K-W. Spatial epidemiological approaches in disease mapping and analysis. USA: CRC Press; 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  59. Robertson C, Nelson TA, MacNab YC, Lawson AB. Review of methods for space–time disease surveillance. Spatial Spatio-Temporal Epidemiol. 2010;1(2–3):105–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Miskelly F. Electronic tracking of patients with dementia and wandering using mobile phone technology. Age Ageing. 2005;34(5):497–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afi145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Shin D, Shin D, Shin D. Ubiquitous health management system with watch-type monitoring device for dementia patients. J Appl Mathemat. 2014;2014:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/878741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. McGrail MR. Spatial accessibility of primary health care utilising the two step floating catchment area method: an assessment of recent improvements. Int J Health Geogr. 2012;11(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-11-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Puthusseryppady V, Coughlan G, Patel M, Hornberger M. Geospatial analysis of environmental risk factors for missing dementia patients. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;71(3):1005–13. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-190244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Yen C-F, Lin S-W. Justice in dementia care resource allocation: how should we plan for dementia services? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(10):1754. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101754.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Shoval N, Wahl H-W, Auslander G, Isaacson M, Oswald F, Edry T, et al. Use of the global positioning system to measure the out-of-home mobility of older adults with differing cognitive functioning. Ageing Soc. 2011;31(5):849–69. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X10001455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Loop MS, Kent ST, Al-Hamdan MZ, Crosson WL, Estes SM, Estes MG Jr, et al. Fine particulate matter and incident cognitive impairment in the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) cohort. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(9): e75001. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Paul KC, Ling C, Lee A, To TM, Cockburn M, Haan M, et al. Cognitive decline, mortality, and organophosphorus exposure in aging Mexican Americans. Environ Res. 2018;160:132–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.09.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Glymour MM, Kosheleva A, Wadley VG, Weiss C, Manly JJ. The geographic distribution of dementia mortality: elevated mortality rates for black and white Americans by place of birth. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2011;25(3):196. https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0b013e31820905e7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Akushevich I, Yashkin AP, Yashin AI, Kravchenko J. Geographic disparities in mortality from Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021;69(8):2306–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.17215.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Almeida MCdS, Gomes CdMS, Nascimento LFC. Spatial distribution of deaths due to Alzheimer’s disease in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Sao Paulo Med J. 2014;132:199–204. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2014.1324610.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Amin R, Yacko E, Guttmann RP. Geographic clusters of Alzheimer’s Disease mortality rates in the USA: 2008–2012. J Prevent Alzheimer’s Dis. 2018;5(4):231–5. https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2018.36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Forrester JD, Kugeler KJ, Perea AE, Pastula DM, Mead PS. No geographic correlation between Lyme disease and death due to 4 neurodegenerative disorders, United States, 2001–2010. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(11):2036. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2111.150778.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Imaizumi Y. Mortality rate of Alzheimer’s disease in Japan: secular trends, marital status, and geographical variations. Acta Neurol Scand. 1992;86(5):501–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.1992.tb05132.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Xu W, Wu C. Detecting spatiotemporal clusters of dementia mortality in the United States, 2000–2010. Spatial Spatio Temporal Epidemiol. 2018;27:11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sste.2018.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Yin P, Feng X, Astell-Burt T, Page A, Liu J, Liu Y, et al. Temporal trends and geographic variations in dementia mortality in China Between 2006 and 2012: multilevel evidence from a nationally representative sample. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2016;30(4):348–53. https://doi.org/10.1097/wad.0000000000000147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Gavurová B, Kováč V, Jarčušková D. Development of Regional Disparities in Alzheimer’s Disease Mortality in the Slovak Republic from 1996 to 2015 1996 to 2015. Int J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2018:2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3149495.

  77. Frecker M. Dementia in Newfoundland: identification of a geographical isolate? J Epidemiol Commun Health. 1991;45(4):307–11. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.45.4.307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Flaten TP. Geographical associations between aluminium in drinking water and death rates with dementia (including Alzheimer’s disease), Parkinson’s disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Norway. Environ Geochem Health. 1990;12(1):152–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01734064.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Liu B, Ornstein KA, Alpert N, Schwartz RM, Dharmarajan KV, Kelley AS, et al., editors. Trends of hospitalizations among patients with both cancer and dementia diagnoses in New York 2007–2017. Healthcare; 2021;9:100565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100565.

  80. Jean H, Emard J-F, Thouez J-P, Houde L, Robitaille Y, Mathieu J, et al. Alzheimer’s disease: preliminary study of spatial distribution at birth place. Soc Sci Med. 1996;42(6):871–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00185-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Emard JF, Andre P, Thouez J-P, Mathieu J, Boily C, Beaudry M, et al. Geographical distribution of Alzheimer’s disease cases at birth and the geochemical profile of Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean/Québec, Canada (image project). Water Air Soil Pollut. 1994;72(1):251–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Scerpella DL, Adam A, Marx K, Gitlin LN. Implications of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for targeted recruitment of older adults with dementia and their caregivers in the community: a retrospective analysis. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019;14: 100338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100338.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Puthusseryppady V, Coughlan G, Patel M, Hornberger M. Geospatial analysis of environmental risk factors for missing dementia patients. J Alzheimer’s Dis JAD. 2019;71(3):1005–13. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-190244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Matthews FE, Arthur A, Barnes LE, Bond J, Jagger C, Robinson L, et al. A two-decade comparison of prevalence of dementia in individuals aged 65 years and older from three geographical areas of England: results of the Cognitive Function and Ageing Study I and II. The Lancet. 2013;382(9902):1405–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61570-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Reed DM, Brody JA. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and parkinsonism-dementia on Guam, 1945–1972: I. Descriptive epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 1975;101(4):287–301. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112097.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Whalley LJ, Thomas BM, McGonigal G, McQuade CA, Swingler R, Black R. Epidemiology of presenile Alzheimer’s disease in Scotland (1974–88) I. Non-random geographical variation. Br J Psychiatry J Mental Sci. 1995;167(6):728–31. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.167.6.728.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Aw JYH, Smurthwaite K, Bagheri N. Investigating spatial convergence of diagnosed dementia, depression and type 2 diabetes prevalence in West Adelaide. Aust J Affect Disord. 2020;277:524–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Baer DR, Lawson AB, Joseph JE. Joint space-time Bayesian disease mapping via quantification of disease risk association. Stat Methods Med Res. 2021;30(1):35–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280220938975.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Bagheri N, Wangdi K, Cherbuin N, Anstey KJ. General practice clinical data help identify dementia hotspots: a novel geospatial analysis approach. J Alzheimer’s Dis JAD. 2018;61(1):125–34. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-170079.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Kirson NY, Meadows ES, Desai U, Smith BP, Cheung HC, Zuckerman P, et al. Temporal and geographic variation in the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis in the US between 2007 and 2014. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(2):346–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Robertson H, Nicholas N, Travaglia J, Hayen A, Georgiou A. A Virtual earth model of the dementias in China. Stud Health Technol Informat. 2017;245:569–72. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-830-3-569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Zhang ZX, Anderson DW, Mantel N. Geographic patterns of parkinsonism-dementia complex on Guam. 1956 through 1985. Arch Neurol. 1990;47(10):1069–74. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1990.00530100031010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Kreft D, Doblhammer G. Sex and Gender Differences in Environmental Influences on Dementia Incidence in Germany, 2014–2019: an observational cohort study based on health claims data. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2022;87:223–37. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-215030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Connor SR, Elwert F, Spence C, Christakis NA. Geographic variation in hospice use in the United States in 2002. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007;34(3):277–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.03.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Jensen-Dahm C, Zakarias JK, Gasse C, Waldemar G. Geographical variation in opioid use in elderly patients with dementia: a nationwide study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;70(4):1209–16. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-190413.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Edwards M, Johnson L, Mauer C, Barber R, Hall J, O’Bryant S. Regional specific groundwater arsenic levels and neuropsychological functioning: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Health Res. 2014;24(6):546–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2014.883591.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Cleary EG, Cifuentes M, Grinstein G, Brugge D, Shea TB. Association of low-level ozone with cognitive decline in older adults. J Alzheimer’s Dis JAD. 2018;61(1):67–78. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-170658.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Shi L, Steenland K, Li H, Liu P, Zhang Y, Lyles RH, et al. A national cohort study (2000–2018) of long-term air pollution exposure and incident dementia in older adults in the United States. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27049-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Powell WR, Buckingham WR, Larson JL, Vilen L, Yu M, Salamat MS, et al. Association of neighborhood-level disadvantage with Alzheimer disease neuropathology. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(6). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7559.

  100. Biglieri S, Dean J. Everyday built environments of care: Examining the socio-spatial relationalities of suburban neighbourhoods for people living with dementia. Wellbeing Space Soc. 2021;2: 100058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2021.100058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Li CY, Li CH, Martini S, Hou WH. Association between air pollution and risk of vascular dementia: a multipollutant analysis in Taiwan. Environ Int. 2019;133(Pt B): 105233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105233.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Rodriguez-Loureiro L, Gadeyne S, Bauwelinck M, Lefebvre W, Vanpoucke C, Casas L. Long-term exposure to residential greenness and neurodegenerative disease mortality among older adults: a 13-year follow-up cohort study. Environ Health. 2022;21(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-022-00863-x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Motohiro A, Abe T, Okuyama K, Onoda K, Ito T, Isomura M, et al. Environmental factors affecting cognitive function among community-dwelling older adults: a longitudinal study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(16):8528. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168528.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Wu YT, Clare L, Jones IR, Nelis SM, Quinn C, Martyr A, et al. Perceived and objective availability of green and blue spaces and quality of life in people with dementia: results from the IDEAL programme. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021;56(9):1601–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-021-02030-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Slawsky ED, Hajat A, Rhew IC, Russette H, Semmens EO, Kaufman JD, et al. Neighborhood greenspace exposure as a protective factor in dementia risk among U.S. adults 75 years or older: a cohort study. Environ Health Global Access Sci Sour. 2022;21(1):14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-022-00830-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Mortamais M, Gutierrez L-A, de Hoogh K, Chen J, Vienneau D, Carrière I, et al. Long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and risk of dementia: results of the prospective three-city study. Environ Int. 2021;148: 106376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106376.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Smargiassi A, Sidi EAL, Robert LE, Plante C, Haddad M, Gamache P, et al. Exposure to ambient air pollutants and the onset of dementia in Québec, Canada. Environ Res. 2020;190: 109870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109870.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Tani Y, Hanazato M, Fujiwara T, Suzuki N, Kondo K. Neighborhood sidewalk environment and incidence of dementia in older Japanese adults the Japan gerontological evaluation study cohort. Am J Epidemiol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwab043.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Watts A, Ferdous F, Moore KD, Burns JM. Neighborhood integration and connectivity predict cognitive performance and decline. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2015;1. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333721415599141.

  110. Yu Y, Mayeda ER, Paul KC, Lee E, Jerrett M, Su J, et al. Traffic-related noise exposure and late-life dementia and cognitive impairment in Mexican–Americans. Epidemiology. 2020;31(6):771–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0000000000001249.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. Zuelsdorff M, Larson JL, Hunt JFV, Kim AJ, Koscik RL, Buckingham WR, et al. The area deprivation index: a novel tool for harmonizable risk assessment in Alzheimer’s disease research. Alzheimer’s Demen (New York, NY). 2020;6(1): e12039. https://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Brown SC, Perrino T, Lombard J, Wang K, Toro M, Rundek T, et al. Health Disparities in the Relationship of Neighborhood Greenness to Mental Health Outcomes in 249,405 U.S. Medicare Beneficiaries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(3):430. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15030430.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. Martyn CN, Barker DJ, Osmond C, Harris EC, Edwardson JA, Lacey RF. Geographical relation between Alzheimer’s disease and aluminum in drinking water. Lancet (London, England). 1989;1(8629):59–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(89)91425-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Oswald F, Wahl H-W, Voss E, Schilling O, Freytag T, Auslander G, et al. The use of tracking technologies for the analysis of outdoor mobility in the face of dementia: First steps into a project and some illustrative findings from Germany. J Hous Elder. 2010;24(1):55–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763890903327481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Bayat S, Mihailidis A. Outdoor life in dementia: how predictable are people with dementia in their mobility? Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis. Assessment Dis Monit. 2021;13(1): e12187. https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Bayat S, Naglie G, Rapoport MJ, Stasiulis E, Widener MJ, Mihailidis A. A GPS-based framework for understanding outdoor mobility patterns of older adults with dementia: an exploratory study. Gerontology. 2021;68:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1159/000515391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Chung J, Boyle J, Pretzer-Aboff I, Knoefel J, Young HM, Wheeler DC. Using a GPS watch to characterize life-space mobility in dementia: a dyadic case study. J Gerontol Nurs. 2021;47(10):15–22. https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20210908-03.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Liddle J, Ireland D, Krysinska K, Harrison F, Lamont R, Karunanithi M, et al. Lifespace metrics of older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia recorded via geolocation data. Australas J Ageing. 2021;40(4):e341–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.13007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Tung JY, Rose RV, Gammada E, Lam I, Roy EA, Black SE, et al. Measuring life space in older adults with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease using mobile phone GPS. Gerontology. 2014;60(2):154–62. https://doi.org/10.1159/000355669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Fei CT, Yusof UK, Khalid MNA. Alzheimer patient detection using Bayesian network model. Adv Sci Lett. 2018;24(2):1289–92. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.10734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Isaacson M, Shoval N, Wahl H-W, Oswald F, Auslander G. Compliance and data quality in GPS-based studies. Transportation. 2016;43(1):25–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9560-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Hunt JF, Vogt NM, Jonaitis EM, Buckingham WR, Koscik RL, Zuelsdorff M, et al. Association of neighborhood context, cognitive decline, and cortical change in an unimpaired cohort. Neurology. 2021;96(20):e2500–12. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000011918.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Salm A, Benson MJ. Increased dementia mortality in West Virginia counties with mountaintop removal mining? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(21):4278. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214278.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. Procter R, Wherton J, Greenhalgh T. Hidden work and the challenges of scalability and sustainability in ambulatory assisted living. ACM Transac Comput Human Interact (TOCHI). 2018;25(2):1–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3185591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Chang Y-J, Wang FT-Y, Chen S-F, Ma T-S. Anomaly detection to increase commuter safety for individuals with cognitive impairments. J Develop Phys Disabil. 2012;24(1):9–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-011-9251-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Miskelly F. Electronic tracking of patients with dementia and wandering using mobile phone technology. Age Ageing. 2005;34(5):497–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afi145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Lin Q, Zhang D, Connelly K, Ni H, Yu Z, Zhou X. Disorientation detection by mining GPS trajectories for cognitively-impaired elders. Pervasive Mob Comput. 2015;19:71–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2014.01.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Werner S, Auslander GK, Shoval N, Gitlitz T, Landau R, Heinik J. Caregiving burden and out-of-home mobility of cognitively impaired care-recipients based on GPS tracking. Int Psychogeriatr. 2012;24(11):1836–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610212001135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Wojtusiak J, Nia RM. Location prediction using GPS trackers: can machine learning help locate the missing people with dementia? Internet Things. 2021;13: 100035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2019.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Hegde N, Muralidhara S, Ashoka D. A low-cost and autonomous tracking device for Alzheimer’s patients. J Enabling Technol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1108/JET-03-2019-0017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Yi J, Lee HC-Y, Parsons R, Falkmer T. The effect of the global positioning system on the driving performance of people with mild Alzheimer’s disease. Gerontology. 2015;61(1):79–88. https://doi.org/10.1159/000365922.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Harada K, Lee S, Shimada H, Lee S, Bae S, Anan Y, et al. Distance to screening site and older adults’ participation in cognitive impairment screening. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2018;18(1):146–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.13133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Tabert MH, Liu X, Doty RL, Serby M, Zamora D, Pelton GH, et al. A 10-item smell identification scale related to risk for Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol. 2005;58(1):155–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20533.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Chung Y, Bagheri N, Salinas-Perez JA, Smurthwaite K, Walsh E, Furst M, et al. Role of visual analytics in supporting mental healthcare systems research and policy: a systematic scoping review. Int J Inf Manage. 2020;50:17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.04.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Organization WH. Towards a dementia plan: a WHO guide. 2018.

  136. Davenhall WF, Kinabrew C. GIS in health and human services. In: Springer handbook of geographic information. Berlin: Springer; 2011. pp. 557–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72680-7_29.

  137. Dulin MF, Ludden TM, Tapp H, Blackwell J, de Hernandez BU, Smith HA, et al. Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to understand a community’s primary care needs. J Am Board Family Med. 2010;23(1):13–21. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2010.01.090135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Mesgari M, Masoomi Z. GIS applications in public health as a decision making support system and it’s limitation in Iran. World Appl Sci J. 2008;3(1):73–7.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Lee JE, Sung JH, Malouhi M. Statistical validation of a web-based GIS application and its applicability to cardiovascular-related studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(1):2. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13010002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Al-Rubeaan KA, Youssef AM, Subhani SN, Ahmad NA, Al-Sharqawi AH, Ibrahim HM. A Web-based interactive diabetes registry for health care management and planning in Saudi Arabia. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(9): e202. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2722.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  141. Khoshabi M, Taleai M, Motlagh A, Kamal FH. Developing a WebGIS for geo-visualization of cancer. Iran J Cancer Prevent. 2016;9(2). https://doi.org/10.17795/ijcp-3910.

  142. Owen Miller JG. Dementia as a European priority—a policy overview: Alzheimer Europe; 2020 2020.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank UC Visual and Decision Analytics (VIDE) lab, Australian Dementia Research Foundation and the University of New South Wales to support two Research assistants’ contribution to this work.

Funding

This study did not receive any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Informatics, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

    Neda Firouraghi, Behzad Kiani, Ahmad Raeesi & Nasser Bagheri

  2. École de Santé Publique de L’Université de Montréal (ESPUM), Québec, Montréal, Canada

    Behzad Kiani

  3. Visual and Decision Analytics Lab, Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia

    Hossein Tabatabaei Jafari

  4. Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, Building 23 Office B32, University Drive, Bruce, Canberra, ACT, 2617, Australia

    Vincent Learnihan & MaryAnne Furst

  5. Department of Quantitative Methods,, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Spain Faculty of Medicine, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia

    Jose A. Salinas-Perez

  6. Mental Health Policy Unit, Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia

    Luis Salvador-Carulla

  7. Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

    Luis Salvador-Carulla

Authors
  1. Neda Firouraghi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Behzad Kiani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hossein Tabatabaei Jafari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vincent Learnihan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jose A. Salinas-Perez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ahmad Raeesi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. MaryAnne Furst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Luis Salvador-Carulla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Nasser Bagheri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Design and Conceptualization: NB, LSC, NF, BK; Data Methodology (screening and data extraction): NF, HTJ, VL, JSP, AR, MF. Original draft preparation: NF, NB, BK, HT; review and editing: All authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Neda Firouraghi or Behzad Kiani.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1

. PRISMA-ScR-Checklist.

Additional file 2

. Search Strategy.

Additional file 3

. Extraction Table.

Additional file 4

. Techniques.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Firouraghi, N., Kiani, B., Jafari, H.T. et al. The role of geographic information system and global positioning system in dementia care and research: a scoping review. Int J Health Geogr 21, 8 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-022-00308-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-022-00308-1

Keywords

  • Dementia
  • Geographic information system
  • Spatial analysis
  • Global positioning systems
  • GPS
  • GIS

International Journal of Health Geographics

ISSN: 1476-072X